7
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Should Colon-Penetrating Small Missiles Be Removed? An Experimental Study of Retrocolic Wound Tracks

Pages 25-29 | Published online: 09 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Small-fragment injury to the colon may occur in approximately 5% of battlefield casualties. The surgical management aims to reduce the risk of retrocolic infection and provide optimal conditions for colonic wound healing. This study aimed to quantify the risk of retrocolic infection. Steel fragments were fired through exteriorized porcine colon and caught in 20% gelatin. The fragments, and resultant tracks, were extracted and subjected to quantitative bacteriological examination to determine the extent of contamination. The median bacterial count for complete tracks was 1.2 104 CFU/g (interquartile range 1.8 103 to 2.7 104). Counts were highest in the initial 1 cm of the track and reduced along its length. This study does not support wound track excision or missile fragment removal in cases of retrocolic trauma following penetrating colonic injury. Either or both procedures will increase local trauma and are likely to prejudice colonic wound repair.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.