Publication Cover
Inhalation Toxicology
International Forum for Respiratory Research
Volume 30, 2018 - Issue 7-8
133
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Assessment of cyclohexanone toxicity in inhalation-exposed F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice: applications in occupational health

, , , &
Pages 247-254 | Received 03 May 2018, Accepted 10 Aug 2018, Published online: 28 Sep 2018
 

Abstract

Background: Cyclohexanone is a chemical used in various industries and many workers are exposed to it. Therefore, in this study, we determined the toxicity of cyclohexanone in inhalation-exposed F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice, so as to apply the findings in hazard and risk assessments.

Methods: Ten male and 10 female rats and mice per test group were exposed to cyclohexanone vapors at 0, 100, 250, and 625 ppm concentrations for 6 h per day, 5 d per week, and for 13 weeks. All rats and mice were killed after the exposure period. Clinical signs, body weight, feed intake, and ophthalmoscopy findings were recorded during the exposure period, and hematology, blood biochemistry, organ weights, gross findings, and histopathology were evaluated thereafter.

Results: The following findings were noted in cyclohexanone-exposed F344 rats: increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, increased liver weight, and bile duct hyperplasia in the males exposed to 250 and 625 ppm cyclohexanone, increased ALT levels and bile duct hyperplasia in the females exposed to 625 ppm cyclohexanone, and increased blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and tubular basophilia in the renal cortex in the males exposed to 625 ppm cyclohexanone. On the other hand, B6C3F1 mice exposed to cyclohexanone showed no obvious exposure-related effects.

Conclusion: Based on the findings, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was determined to be 100 ppm in F344 rats and >625 ppm in B6C3F1 mice. Therefore, 2 ppm was revealed as the derived no-effect level (DNEL) for cyclohexanone.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, Ministry of Employment and Labor, Republic of Korea, and a Grant-in-Aid for chemical hazard assessment, 2017.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.