192
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

In vitro evaluation of archaeosome vehicles for transdermal vaccine delivery

, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 305-314 | Received 09 Jun 2017, Accepted 01 Sep 2017, Published online: 26 Sep 2017
 

Abstract

Archaeosomes composed of archaeal total polar lipids (TPL) or semi-synthetic analog vesicles have been used as vaccine adjuvants and delivery systems in animal models for many years. Typically administered by intramuscular or subcutaneous injections, archaeosomes can induce robust, long-lasting humoral and cell-mediated immune responses against entrapped antigens and provide protection in murine models of infectious disease and cancer. Herein, we evaluated various archaeosomes for transdermal delivery, since this route may help eliminate needle-stick injuries and needle re-use, and therefore increase patient compliance. Archaeosomes composed of TPL from different archaea (Halobacterium salinarum, Methanobrevibacter smithii, Haloferax volcanii) and various semi-synthetic glycolipid combinations were evaluated for their ability to diffuse across the skin barrier using an ex vivo pig skin model and the results were compared to conventional synthetic ester liposomes. Physicochemical characteristics were determined for selected formulations including vesicle size, size distribution, zeta potential, fluidity, antigen (ovalbumin) incorporation efficiency and release. Archaeosomes, in particular those composed of M. smithii TPL or the synthetic glycolipid sulfated S-lactosylarchaeol (SLA) mixed with uncharged glycolipid lactosyl archaeol (LA), appeared to be effective carriers for ovalbumin, achieving much better antigen distribution and vesicle accumulation in the skin epidermis than conventional liposomes. The enhanced skin permeation of archaeosomes may be attributed to their chemical structure and physicochemical properties such as particle size, surface charge, stability, and fluidity of their lipid bilayer.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge John Shelvey and Peter Fleming for producing the archaeal biomass. We are grateful to Dr. Linda Johnston for her support with the fluorescent spectrometry.

Disclosure of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.