564
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Development and evaluation of stability and ultrasound response of DSPC-DPSG-based freeze-dried microbubbles

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 368-374 | Received 13 Oct 2018, Accepted 01 Dec 2018, Published online: 28 Jan 2019
 

Abstract

It is known that Phosphatidyl choline-Phosphatidyl glycerol mixtures can be used for liposome formulations, making them less leaky than liposomes with only one lipid. We hypothesized that this might also be the case for bubbles, which can be used as ultrasound (US) contrast agents. Therefore, we have compared a series of mixed distearoyl phosphatidylcholine-distearoyl phosphatidylglycerol (DSPC-DPSG) bubbles and with bubbles containing either DSPC or DSPG (and distearoyl ethanolamine-polyethyleneglycol 2000, DSPE-PEG2k). Here, we describe the development, examination of stability in vitro and attenuation of broad frequency US pulses. Novel lipid-stabilized freeze-dried formulations for US applications, using the phospholipids DSPC, DSPG, and PEGylated DSPE-PEG2k and perfluoropropane gas were developed. It was found that the bubbles could effectively be preserved by freeze-drying and then re-constituted by addition of water. Average bubble sizes were around 2 µm for all bubbles after re-constitution. Bubble stability was assessed by evaluating the decay of the US backscattering signal in vitro. Bubbles containing DSPG were more stable than bubbles with only DSPC. The composition DSPC:DSPG:DSPE-PEG2k 30:60:10 (molar ratio) was the most stable with an effective half-life of 9.12 min, compared to bubbles without DSPG, which had half-life of 2.05 min. Bubble attenuation of US depended highly on the compositions. Bubbles without DSPG had the highest attenuation indicating higher oscillation the most but were also destroyed by higher energy US. No bubbles with DSPG showed any indication of destruction but all had increased attenuations to varying degrees, DSPC:DSPG:DSPE-PEG2k 45:45:10 showed the least attenuation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by MEXT-Support Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities, 2013–2017. Grant Number S1311015 and JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) Grant Number 16H03196.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.