ABSTRACT
In this article, we compare the statistical properties of ,
, and RWAV methods for estimation of variance of a process for quality control purposes. We investigate effects of non-normality for different estimators. Our results indicate that RWAV gives the best estimates of the standard deviations for both normal and non-normal processes. We recommend the construction of control charts with RWAV.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the editor and two anonymous referees for their assistance.
Notes
*WINNER means the estimator with smallest MAE among the three under certain process conditions. For example, if a cell is the WINNER and is column RWAV, it means RWAV possesses a smaller MAE than /c
4 and
/d
2. MAE is the WINNER and is shown at the cell on the left.