Comparison of hospitalist service staffing models at Baylor University Medical Center

Abstract

Background

Baylor University Medical Center benefits from being a quaternary care center with 900+ licensed beds and multiple different models to staff patients on the hospitalist service. These models include hospitalist only, resident teaching teams, and two different advanced practice practitioner teams. The primary goal of this study was to assess these different staffing models and to ascertain which model, if any, has better outcomes related to length of stay, total hospital charges, 30-day readmission rates, patient satisfaction, hospital-acquired infections, mortality, and early discharges.

Methods

The study was an observational retrospective chart review of all discharges from the hospitalist service at Baylor University Medical Center from October 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022. Patients were included if the hospitalist team was the primary team of record at the time of discharge. A total of 7803 patients were included.

Results

There was no difference in patient satisfaction, hospital-acquired infections, and mortality between the groups. The teaching teams had a shorter length of stay before the removal of outliers. Independent advanced practice practitioners reliably had more patients discharged before 11:30 am. Results support the concept of continuity of care, as well as lower patient-to-provider ratios.

Conclusions

These results have actionable implications that support the use of different advanced practice practitioner teams for the safe care of hospitalized patients as well as the safe integration of residents into patient care.

Keywords:

• Advanced practice provider
• continuity of care
• length of stay
• patient satisfaction
• patient-to-provider ratio
• readmission rates

Disclosure statement/Funding

The authors report no funding or conflicts of interest.