803
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Agricultural drainage in Lithuania: a review of practices and environmental effects

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 14-29 | Received 02 Jun 2014, Accepted 25 Sep 2014, Published online: 27 Mar 2015

Abstract

In Lithuania, artificial drainage is a common agricultural practice. The country remains one of the most extensively drained in the world. The total drained land area occupies 47% of the country's land area and 86% of the agricultural land area, of which 87% is tile-drained. Although the introduction of drainage has improved the quality of agricultural land, the benefits of drainage are associated with many changes in the local environment. Therefore, a review is presented of the results from various investigations and research studies conducted in Lithuania which have reported the historical and economic aspects of the development of agricultural drainage as well as its environmental effects on landscape structure, local hydrology and nutrient losses in the soil. Temporal changes in drainage run-off since the 1970s are also discussed. Furthermore, positive bidirectional effects of natural processes in and around open drain ditches on both environment and practice are highlighted which show the possibility of fostering them intentionally.

Introduction

Lithuania covers a total area of 65.3 × 103 km2 and is situated along the south-eastern shore of the Baltic Sea (). The country's climate is temperate, determined by the macro-processes in the atmosphere and local geographical factors. The spatial variations in the long-term annual averages of the main climatic characteristics are as follows: solar radiation 2298–3185 MJ m−2; air temperature 6.1°C–8.0°C; precipitation 560–910 mm; and evapotranspiration 500–580 mm. There are 30,000 streams longer than 0.25 km. The average density of the stream network is 0.99 km km−2. Run-off coefficient (defined as the ratio between average annual run-off and precipitation) is 0.32. Annual specific discharge (rate of discharge per unit of area) within the country varies from 5.0 to 12.0 L s−1 km−2 (Galvonaitė et al. Citation2013). The atmospheric supply of water, along with the rather plain topography and low permeability of prevailing glacial tills, has resulted in more than 33.7 × 103 km2 of soils suffering from excess moisture (Aleknavičius Citation1989).

Figure 1. Map of Lithuania, showing the location of the studied rivers and drainage research sites mentioned in the analysis. (Symbols in the legend: 1 – rivers and streams; 2 – lakes; 3 – river water monitoring site; 4 – drainage water monitoring site; 5–8 – percentage distribution of drained agricultural area: 5 – below 65%; 6 – 65%–75%; 7 – 75%–85%; 8 – over 85%).
Figure 1. Map of Lithuania, showing the location of the studied rivers and drainage research sites mentioned in the analysis. (Symbols in the legend: 1 – rivers and streams; 2 – lakes; 3 – river water monitoring site; 4 – drainage water monitoring site; 5–8 – percentage distribution of drained agricultural area: 5 – below 65%; 6 – 65%–75%; 7 – 75%–85%; 8 – over 85%).

To deal with the excess moisture, drainage of agricultural land in Lithuania started at the end of the nineteenth century. According to Čeičys et al. (Citation1970), by the end of Second World War, 487.2 × 103 ha of land had been drained (7.5% of the whole area of the country) and 19,437 km of ditches dug. By then, it was primarily shallow ditches which drained the agricultural land, with only a small area of about 12 × 103 ha drained by subsurface drainage. This situation continued until the 1960s, when the lands were mostly drained by open drains. The shallow 2–3 m wide ditches excavated 20–50 m apart removed the excess soil moisture. Their efficiency was low, but the method was cheap and the only available measure at that time.

The shallow drain ditches significantly enhanced the overall density of ditches per unit of drained area by an average of up to 4.0–4.5 km km−2 (). The density of open drains began to decrease drastically when, in the sixth through ninth decades, the technology of tile pipe production was developed. This meant that the areas annually drained by means of subsurface drainage increased significantly. Surface drainage systems began to be replaced by subsurface drainage. The total area drained by subsurface drainage added up to 2620.5 × 103 ha, or about 72% of the total agricultural land area, and most drainage works were completed during this period.

Figure 2. Overall ditch density in drained area (Povilaitis Citation2001).
Figure 2. Overall ditch density in drained area (Povilaitis Citation2001).

Subsequently, the draining of land almost ceased (). The density of open ditches dropped to about 2.1 km km−2. These open ditches, totalling 63,400 km or 82.6% of the entire hydrographical network in Lithuania, are an integral part of every current drainage system. About 15% of them have been excavated along the edges of forests to protect farm fields from spring thaw waters. The remaining 85% of these open ditches, about 53,000 km, have been designed only to collect and divert the water from subsurface drainage systems. Most of these ditches, about 46,000 km (87%), are regulated natural streams of the first to the fourth order (Jablonskis Citation2001).

Figure 3. The dynamics of the installation of subsurface drainage systems (Povilaitis et al. Citation2011).
Figure 3. The dynamics of the installation of subsurface drainage systems (Povilaitis et al. Citation2011).

During the sixth through ninth decades, 1603.7 × 103 km of subsurface drainage lines were installed; some 270.3 × 103 km of these lines comprised subsurface drain collectors and the remaining ones, 1333.4 × 103 km, comprised lateral drains. The subsurface drainage in Lithuania was largely built by applying tile pipes. Diameters of the tile pipes ranged from 4.0 to 7.5 cm for lateral drains and from 7.5 to 25.0 cm for collectors. The diameters of drain collectors were even larger if the drainage system took in an extremely large area of several tens or hundreds of hectares. The pipes of these large drain collectors were made of concrete, ferro-concrete or asbestos. The drain spacing, depending primarily on soil texture and longitudinal gradient, ranged between 16 and 30 m and had a depth of 0.9–1.2 m. The drain line's longitudinal gradients were 0.004–0.01 m·m−1. Plastic (polythene) pipes have only been used since 1986. Currently, plastic pipes are the only pipes used for drainage purposes in Lithuania. Depending on local soil and climate conditions, the average annual specific subsurface drainage discharge in different parts of the country ranges from 4.0 to 6.0 L s−1 km−2.

Throughout the history of land drainage, the overall drained area (ditches plus tile drains) totalled 3021.4 × 103 ha, or 87% of the agricultural land area. Of the Baltic and Nordic countries, Lithuania, with a tile-drained area of 2620.5 × 103 ha, spearheaded the installation of subsurface drainage: in Latvia, about 1500 × 103 ha is tile-drained; in Estonia, 700 × 103 ha; in Sweden, 1200 × 103 ha; in Denmark, 1400 × 103 ha; and in Finland, 1000 × 103 ha (Povilaitis et al. Citation2011). Agricultural drainage has enabled radically improved soil cultivation and plant growth conditions. Therefore, in order to improve information about the drained land and its state since 1996, the GIS-based Land Reclamation Database, on a scale of 1:10,000, was generated in Lithuania (Povilaitis Citation2002). In some regions within the country, this digital information is available on a scale of 1:2000.

However, during the period of enhanced draining activity from 1955 to 1995, some questionable measures were taken. For example, nearly 50 × 103 ha of wetlands was destroyed. Also, in 1966, there were still 280,000 individual farmsteads surrounded by various elements of landscape: meadows and pastures, shrubs, fruit trees and kitchen gardens, etc. Unfortunately, such a large number of farmsteads ‘impeded’ drainage works, and more than 115,000 of those farmsteads were evicted into settlements until 1990 (Povilaitis Citation2001).

Furthermore, all abiotic and biotic varieties of the former stream channel conditions and their original riparian zones were destroyed when the streams were regulated. The regulated streams were straightened, deepened and trapezium-shaped with narrow (1 m width) grassy buffer strips. Drainage activities significantly changed the structure of the landscape: expanded fields were practical for farming but open to soil erosion and deflation. The landscape lost the patchiness and heterogeneity which, according to Forman (Citation1995), ensured the landscape's resistance to disturbance.

In the 1990s, it was found that the accelerated and enhanced lessening of the water table by subsurface drains and the expansion of arable areas, as well as the regulation of streams and destruction of the riparian zones, had managed to cause some damage to rivers and soil cover (Pauliukevičius & Juodis Citation1987; Račinskas & Beliauskas Citation1987; Vaitkevičius Citation1989; Zalakevicius Citation2001). On the other hand, drainage systems in Lithuania are ageing. Their average lifetime is something over 40 years. This means that about 56% of subsurface drains and 76% of ditches are suffering from deterioration today. Intensive land drainage has also raised issues regarding its impact on local hydrology and water quality.

The purpose of this paper is to present a short review of the research findings on agricultural drainage in Lithuania, with specific reference to its effects on local hydrology, nutrient losses from soil and measures aimed at reducing negative impacts.

Results and discussion

Economic benefit of land drainage

Agricultural drainage installed for soil water control plays a major role in the development of plant and animal production in Lithuania. In 2013, the total asset value of drainage structures in the country was 2.67 billion Litas (1 Litas = 0.289 Euros; Reclaimed land Citation2014).

Land productivity in Lithuania is ranked by conventional points, which vary from 25 to over 50. Therefore, land drainage enables the country to grade upgrade land productivity, from 7.2 to 21.4 extra points (; Buivydaitė et al. Citation1999). Cambisols prevailing in the Middle Lithuanian Lowland are particularly fertile. This region is superior to other regions in the country. According to the analysis conducted at the Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics (Agriculture in Lithuania Citation2000), marketable plant growing is profitable only in regions where agricultural land productivity exceeds the mean value of the whole country (i.e. 39.1 points). Depending on land productivity, the income from crop cultivation in different regions differs 3.5 times (calculated for 1 ha of agricultural land). Comparison of the income of farmers with rich and poor soils showed that they differ by 1.5 times (). Statistical analysis by Šaulys and Lukianas (Citation2003) showed a strong dependence on the income of farms from crop cultivation on drained land.

Figure 4. Land productivity extra points gained due to drainage in different Lithuanian administrative districts (a); and the relationship between common income (black dots) and the income from crop cultivation (hollow dots) against land productivity points (b).
Figure 4. Land productivity extra points gained due to drainage in different Lithuanian administrative districts (a); and the relationship between common income (black dots) and the income from crop cultivation (hollow dots) against land productivity points (b).

Issues associated with the economic efficiency of land drainage in Lithuania were analysed by a number of investigators (Buožis & Bastienė Citation1998; Katkevičius et al. Citation1998; Bastienė & Gurklys Citation2007). It was determined that the economic benefit gained from drained agricultural land varies from none up to 413 Litas (120 Euros) for one productivity point. According to the dissimilarity of the profit gained from agricultural activity, the whole territory can be divided into four zones ().

Figure 5. Zones of economic benefit due to land drainage.
Figure 5. Zones of economic benefit due to land drainage.

Currently, one of the most urgent problems in Lithuanian agriculture is the repair of land drainage systems. Because of the lack of financial resources, the state is unable to provide sufficient financing for the maintenance of such a large quantity of drainage structures. For this reason, some of them have been lost. Consequently, the area of inefficiently functioning subsurface drainage has significantly increased, up to 250,000 ha, or about 9.5% (Reclaimed land Citation2014). Legally, about 97% of open drains and 30% of subsurface drains remain under the ownership of the state, and ownership of subsurface drains with a pipe diameter of less than 12.5 cm was transferred to private landowners. Local municipalities are responsible for the maintenance of state-owned drainage systems.

Hydrological effect of land drainage

It is well-known that along with land-use changes the presence of drainage affects the general environment and to some extent the pattern of flow in streams. However, various hydrologic studies conducted in Lithuania (Lukianienė Citation1973; Macevičius & Lukianienė Citation1975; Marčėnas Citation1991; Dumbrauskas & Larsson Citation1993; Juozapaitis & Zelionkienė Citation1997; Dumbrauskas et al. Citation1998; Ruminaitė Citation2010) have produced very controversial results.

This has shown that the effects of agricultural drainage on downstream hydrology are still undetermined. Most hydrologic phenomena have high inter-annual variability. Therefore, changes in the amount of precipitation associated with cyclic weather patterns and the complexity of natural factors can mask the effects of land drainage (Hirsch et al. Citation1990; Robinson Citation1990; Baker et al. Citation2004; Matteau et al. Citation2009; Bormann Citation2010; Jay & Naik Citation2011). The cumulative impacts of natural factors and human-made alterations to the flow regime may go unnoticed because they often occur gradually. Once the hydrologic impact is noticed, it is usually difficult to determine the relative importance of the different causal factors. In order to solve this problem, Povilaitis (Citation2014, Citationin press) attempted to apply multivariate statistical analysis methods (e.g. canonical correlation analysis).

The mean daily flow data from the six monitoring sites in the Mūša, Dotnuvėlė, Obelis, Lėvuo and Šušvė Rivers (see ), with the catchment area varying from 159 to 2280 km2 between 1940 and 1990, were used. The Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) method proposed by Richter et al. (Citation1996), which includes the parameters of flow magnitude, frequency, duration, timing and rate of change (flashiness), was applied. In total, 20 flow variables (dependent variables) were analysed, together with their ranges. The independent variables that were selected comprise (1) the hydrothermic index (defined as a function of the annual amount of precipitation and the sum of the mean daily air temperatures); (2) the sum of positive January–March daily air temperatures; (3) the catchment size (converted into a natural logarithm); (4) the proportion of sandy soil and (5) the dynamics of the total drained land area in each river catchment. All of the independent variables were subsequently correlated with the 20 hydrologic variables according to the canonical correlation analysis (Ouarda et al. Citation2001; Rencher Citation2002).

The results obtained confirmed the dominant role of weather upon streamflow (i.e. the annual hydrothermic index appeared to be the primary factor determining the variability of most hydrologic variables). Concerning the hydrological effects of tile drainage, it was found that drainage alters the time and frequency of high flows the most, i.e. the extent of tile drainage in a river catchment led to a longer duration of high pulses (defined as a daily mean flow that rises above the 75th percentile of all daily values), as well as a later occurrence of annual peaks. In addition, it showed a link to the decreasing number of low pulses (daily mean flows that drop below the 25th percentile of all daily values). The extended duration of high pulses, along with the lag in the occurrence of annual peaks, can be attributed to the ‘sponge’ effect of drainage as described by Skaggs et al. (Citation1994). Drainage decreases the water table, thus increasing the water storage capacity (Augeard et al. Citation2005) by creating a larger volume for water infiltration with subsequently lower evapotranspiration (Van den Eertwegh et al. Citation2006). By changing the flow pathways from the surface to deeper flows for drains, the travel time is increased. Consequently, this extends the duration of high pulses and increases the lag times to peaks.

The decreasing number of low pulses suggests that an efficient hydrological connectivity with the groundwater in the river catchment may exist through tile drainage. This may occur because the greater depth of tile drains provides a deeper outlet for shallow groundwater drainage. A larger groundwater inflow may also contribute by means of deepened stretches of canalised streams and newly dug ditches collecting water from subsurface drains.

Temporal changes in drainage run-off

Today, global warming is a major and controversial issue. It affects many aspects of life. Alterations to the natural environment caused by global climate change have also been noticed in Lithuania. An increase of 0.7°C–1.0°C in average annual air temperature from 1991 to 2006 was detected compared with the average annual air temperature from 1961 to 1990 (Bukantis et al. Citation2008). Air temperature is expected to increase by 1.0°C–1.7°C for the period 2011–2040; 2.0°C–3.4°C for 2041–2070 and 2.7°C–5.3°C for 2071–2100. Precipitation is expected to increase from 1.6% to 2.7% for the period 2011–2040; from 0.3% to 6.6% for 2041–2070 and from 3.6% to 7.9% for 2071–2100. Seasonal variations are expected to lead to increased precipitation during the winter (17%–53%) and spring (4.1%–30.6%) and decreased during the summer (5.5%) and autumn (2.7%). It is expected that the annual river run-off will decrease, but, importantly, run-off during the winter period is expected to increase. These predictions are based on the ECHAM5 and HadCM3 Global Climate models and the A1B, A2, B1 greenhouse gas emission scenarios (Kriaučiūnienė et al. Citation2008; Jakimavičius & Kriaučiūnienė Citation2013).

As 87% of agricultural land area in Lithuania is tile-drained, agricultural drainage has a large impact on the soil-water balance. An analysis of the seasonal values over the last four decades (1969–2009) identified an upward trend in precipitation amounts in cold seasons (November–March) and a downward trend in warm seasons (April–October). Furthermore, statistically significant (p < 0.05) increasing trends of tile-drainage run-off during the winter (December–February) and slightly increasing air temperature during the spring (March–May) were detected (see ; Miseckaitė Citation2010; Miseckaite & Gurklys Citation2011).

Figure 6. Seasonal distribution of mean air temperature (left) and tile-drainage run-off (right) from 1969 to 2009.
Figure 6. Seasonal distribution of mean air temperature (left) and tile-drainage run-off (right) from 1969 to 2009.

For Lithuanian conditions, the potential impact of climate change is associated with alterations in the precipitation pattern turning from snowfall to rainfall (Rimkus et al. Citation2007). As a result, tile-drainage run-off volume tends to increase in the winter months. These peculiarities were observed in an analysis of data from 1969 to 2009 from the measurements conducted at five field-scale research sites (each area A = 0.44−0.45 ha; tiles installed at a depth of 0.80–1.40 m with drain spacing of 12–18 m) in the Middle Lithuanian Lowland (54°52′46 N, 23°51′30 E) on calcar-hypogleyic luvisol with sandy loam in the top layer and loam in the deeper layers.

Similar results were obtained from the study area (56°11′ N, 24 32′ E) in glacial lacustrine clay and clay loam soil in the North Lithuanian karst zone. The mean air temperature and precipitation from 1988 to 1999 exceeded the corresponding data from 1976 to 1987 by 1.3°C and 34 mm, respectively (Rudzianskaite Citation2011). A significant increase in air temperature was observed in January and February (4.8°C). For this reason, a 3.3 times higher drainage run-off volume was observed in the winter (January–February) and a 1.6 times lower drainage run-off volume was observed in the spring (March–May) during the period 1988–1999, compared with the period 1976–1987. According to the Mann-Kendall test, statistically significant increasing trends in drainage run-off were detected in January and February. The increased run-off in the cold period and the overall changes in the drainage hydrological regime raise new questions regarding the solutions to environmental problems related to increased nutrient run-off.

Nutrient leaching via subsurface drainage

In has been widely reported that the use of organic and mineral fertilisers in intensive agricultural production leads to increased concentrations of nutrients in drainage run-off. The nutrients of greatest concern are nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) because drainage high in such substances can stimulate the eutrophication of the receiving water bodies (Hoorman et al. Citation2008). Numerous investigations conducted in Lithuania have shown that the typical concentrations of nitrate-N in drainage water can vary from 3 to 20 mg L−1 and the total P levels vary from 0.1 to 0.15 mg L−1 with annual losses ranging from 5 to 40 kg ha−1 for N and from 0.10 to 0.40 kg ha−1 for P.

N and P leaching from different cropping systems

The study carried out by Gužys and Petrokienė (Citation2006) demonstrated that the leaching of nutrients through drainage systems is primarily influenced by the amount of precipitation and drainage run-off volume. It follows that meteorological conditions affect nutrient leaching more than do agricultural practices (Stålnacke & Bechmann Citation2002). However, other studies state that nutrient amounts transported via subsurface drainage systems are highly dependent on soil texture. According to Rimšelis and Šleinys (Citation1996), N losses from sandy soils are often twice as high as losses from loam soils. Švedas et al. (Citation2001) and Rudzianskaite and Miseviciene (Citation2005) reported significant effects of the fertilisation rate on the NO3–N concentration in drainage water: higher fertilisation leads to higher nitrate concentration. The field-scale (A = 0.34−0.38 ha) experiments conducted in the Middle Lithuanian Lowland (55°18′N, 23°51′E) revealed that considerable amounts of N and P could be leached out via tile-drainage systems under different cropping systems ().

Table 1. Average annual leaching of nutrients (kg ha−1) via drainage systems from various cropping systemsa on gleic cambisols between 1995 and 2003 (Bučienė et al. Citation2007).

It is known that nutrient losses can significantly increase, primarily because of the irrational and unbalanced fertilisation rates of both mineral and organic fertilisers. According to Morkunas et al. (Citation2005) and Misevičienė (Citation2006), areas covered with unfertilised or moderately fertilised perennial grass ensure high nutrient uptake and fewer losses of nutrients via drainage systems than do the areas where row and grain crops are cultivated. Therefore, the changes in land use and the ploughing of permanent grass cover consequently contribute to increased nitrate losses from the soil (Povilaitis Citation2000; Mališauskas et al. Citation2005).

A detailed study aimed at evaluating the agro-ecological aspects of different intensity cropping systems was carried out in Lithuania on endocalcari-endohypogleyic cambisols (55°41′N, 2°30′E), where organic and intensive cropping systems were compared on five small-scale (A = 0.50 ha each) autonomous tile-drained fields. The results from this study have shown that organic agriculture has no essential advantage compared with intensive agriculture, considering the amount of nutrients leached via drainage systems and crop productivity (Šileika & Gužys Citation2003). Other field-scale investigations concluded that the amount of N leached via drainage is mostly determined by the N fertilisation and N balance in the agro-ecosystem (Gužys Citation2012). However, agricultural intensification demonstrated only a limited increase in the amount of P leached from the different cropping systems (Gužys Citation2002, Citation2013). No significant impact of the applied crop rotations on phosphates leaching via drainage systems was determined. P losses were found to be much more dependent on the soil texture and soil P and humus content (Bučienė et al. Citation2007).

N and P leaching via subsurface drainage in slurry applied fields

In Lithuania, livestock husbandry has always played a significant role in agriculture. Large numbers of animals are reared in relatively small areas, with consequent large-scale manure production. The disposal of manure is locally aggravated by the limited available land area. Even if the local land is theoretically capable of accommodating the applied manure, related pollution problems may be hard to eliminate.

Regular application of slurry has a negative impact on soil structure, causing soil compaction and reduced aeration (Aksomaitienė et al. Citation1978). Therefore, drainage efficiency decreases and problems with surface water quality occur (Aškinis et al. Citation1999). For this reason, research has concentrated on the impact of liquid manure application on crop yield, soil agrochemical properties and drainage water quality. summarises the results from various field-scale studies conducted in the Nevėžis and Mūša River catchments (Middle Lithuania) where the quality of drainage water in relation to the different forms of manure application was investigated.

Table 2. Studies reporting N and P leaching via subsurface drainage systems from fields receiving slurry and liquid manure.

Livestock waste products in Lithuania are mostly used for application in fields used for perennial grass and feeding crops. However, sometimes vegetables and cereals are also irrigated with slurry. Therefore, an ecologically optimal slurry rate of 40 t ha−1 that can be used for irrigation of vegetables has been determined (Čižauskienė & Misevičienė Citation2001). It was also found that slurry application in the spring results in reduced losses of N and P by 17% and 36%, respectively, in comparison with application in autumn (Misevičienė Citation2002). Čižauskienė et al. (Citation1998) and Misevičienė (Citation2006, Citation2013) reported that the highest amounts of nutrients are leached out via drainage systems in the fields which receive slurry and liquid manure during the cold periods of the year when the soil is without crops and there is more rainfall.

The effect of tillage on N and P leaching

The feasibility of reduced tillage application in Lithuania was suggested as long ago as the 1950s (Vasinauskas Citation1950). However, subsequent field experiments demonstrated that conventional tillage produced the improved soil physical properties (the lowest bulk density, low penetration resistance, the highest air permeability and others) compared with reduced tillage and no-tillage methodologies (Feiza et al. Citation2010). Nevertheless, the application of the no-tillage practice could be what is needed to preserve soil moisture in the early stages of crop development, as well as to save energy resources and reduce the NO3 losses from the soil (Baigys et al. Citation2007, Citation2011).

Research on the effects of the different tillage systems on the drainage flow and N and P leaching through drainage systems was conducted in the Middle Lithuanian Lowland (55°19′N, 23°51′E), where three different tillage treatments were compared (Baigys et al. Citation2007): conventional tillage (commonly used by farmers), late ploughing (used to reduce nutrient leaching) and reduced tillage (used to incorporate stubble and eliminate soil compaction). The experiment was carried out from 2005 to 2010 on tile-drained fields (A = 9.0 ha) with prevailing loam soil in the top layer and sandy loam in the subsoil. The results obtained showed that with reduced tillage treatment nitrate leaching through drainage systems in moderate years of water abundance was 25% lower and in dry years, 33% lower, compared with conventional tillage. The differences between the treatments were highest (3.8 and 13.5 kg ha−1 on average, respectively) in the wintertime. By investigating three cropping systems (arable, ryegrass and fallow), Gužys and Petrokienė (Citation2008a, Citation2008b) also found that the highest inorganic N and P losses through the drainage systems were from fallow (42 and 0.09 kg ha−1, respectively) and the lowest ones were from ryegrass (27 and 0.018 kg ha−1, respectively).

Lime filter drainage

Various literature sources affirm that clayey soil treated with lime amendments could significantly prevent the migration of P (Rhoton & Bigham Citation2005; Murphy & Stevens Citation2010). Therefore, in order to investigate the effect of lime added to the trench backfill on subsurface drainage hydrology and its water quality, field-scale research was performed in the south-western part of Lithuania (55°18′N; 23°06′E) on orthi-haplic (LVh-or) and hapli-epihypogleyic luvisols (LVg-p-w-ha) with clay loam. The research site (A = 14.6 ha) was tile-drained in 1989. The tile pipes were installed at a depth of 1.1 m with drain spacing of 16–24 m and drain trench width of 0.5 m. Drain trench backfill was mixed with lime (0.6% CaO for soil mass). Shale ashes containing 16.8% of CaO were used as liming material. The optimal liming rate was adjusted to accommodate the content of clay in the soil (Šaulys & Bastienė Citation2006).

The obtained results demonstrated that there are significant differences between phosphate concentrations in conventional drainage (CD) outflow and treatments where lime is added to the trench backfill. In the water of CD, these concentrations appeared to be 2.8 times higher. The addition of 0.6% CaO for soil mass reduces the annual load of total P and phosphates by two and three times, respectively, compared with CD systems (Šaulys & Bastienė Citation2008). Also, it was found that the addition of lime in trench backfill leads to increased specific drainage discharge of 30%–50% because of the increased soil conductivity (Šaulys & Bastienė Citation2007). The data from the research site also revealed that the average lifetime of lime filter drainage (LFD) can exceed 20 years without any loss in treatment effect (Bastienė et al. Citation2011). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) confirmed that the lime admixture in heavy soils could considerably reduce P concentrations in drainage water. In the outflow of LFD, the average total P concentrations were 52.3% lower and the average PO4–P concentrations were 68.7% lower than those in the outflow of CD. However, seasonal fluctuations in LFD effectiveness have been established: in the cold season (November–January), the total P concentrations were 2.3–2.7 times lower (p < 0.01) in the water of LFD than in the water of CD, whereas from February to May, the differences were less significant (1.5–2.0 times, p < 0.05). No significant differences have been established for June–October period. The results also indicated that PO4−P concentrations in LFD treatments were significantly lower than those in CD in all months, with the exception of the June-October period, when the drainage usually does not function.

The results from the above-mentioned investigations revealed that, in heavy clay soils, P concentrations in LFD water do not respond either to the precipitation amount or to fluctuations of air temperature. This leads to the conclusion that the effectiveness of the lime addition does not depend on these meteorological factors and, in general, LFD positively affects the quality of drainage water and reduces the transport of P into the surface waters.

Water table management in controlled drainage

The required field drainability for agricultural production is not the same in all seasons of the year from a multi-year perspective. Although wetness is the major concern, weather conditions vary, so crops may also periodically suffer from drought stress. CD systems necessary to reduce waterlogging in the soil and to provide trafficability during wet periods can also limit soil water availability during the drier periods. Therefore, problems with drought on drained soils in many countries have resulted in a transition from CD methods to CWD (subirrigation) systems. In Lithuania, such drainage practices, with the exception of several research and demonstration sites, were not applied because of limitations related to the apportionment of suitable (flat) sites. Existing tile-drainage systems were not designed for drainage outflow control and retrofitting them is costly. According to various literature sources CWD is best suited to soils where ground surface slope does not exceed 2%. The most relevant slope is up to 0.3%. Morkūnas and Ramoška (Citation2001) estimated that CWD practice in Lithuania is economically inexpedient on slopes greater than 1%.

An eight-year (2000–2007) field-scale study aimed at researching drainage control possibilities and their effectiveness from the perspective of soil hydrology and nutrient loss was carried out in the area intensively developed by agriculture in the Middle Lithuanian Lowland, with typical endocalcari-endohipogleyic cambisol soils and flat topography. A site (A = 5.4 ha; 55°19′N; 23°50′E) that had an existing subsurface water removal system operating as a CD was retrofitted for CWD (Morkūnas & Ramoška Citation2001). The control device installed at the drain outlet allowed the groundwater table to rise to 68 cm (maximum) above the tiles. The groundwater rise was adjusted to the site's topography (slope steepness 0.2%–0.9%) and the required groundwater depth for crop growth. Thus, the area impacted by the raised groundwater table covered 52% of the research site.

According to the study results, no statistically significant differences in nitrate concentrations were found in CD and CWD systems: the average annual concentration of NO3−N in CWD water was only 5%–13% lower than in CD treatment (Ramoška et al. Citation2011). According to Evans et al. (Citation1995), CWD can reduce nitrate-N concentrations in drainage outflow by up to 20%. The results from the Lithuanian study revealed that higher differences were detected during the growing season when the NO3−N concentration decreased by 40% and 53% in CWD and CD treatments, respectively, compared with the winter–spring period (Ramoška et al. Citation2011). Other researchers (Lalonde et al. Citation1996) also indicated that during the growing season, when plants assimilate more nutrients, nitrate concentration in the outflow of freely operating drainage decreases by 44%. Simultaneously, in CWD, when the water level above the drains is 0.25 m and 0.50 m, nitrate concentration decreases by only 12% and 28%, respectively.

The reductions in nitrate-N loads determined in CWD systems are generally conditioned by the reduction in drain outflow (Ramoška & Morkūnas Citation2006). Wesström et al. (Citation2003) reports that up to 70%–90% of drainage outflow could be retained by controlling the water level. Evans et al. (Citation1995) stated that the total drainage outflow could be reduced by 30%, primarily because of the reduction in outflow volume. There is less water leaving the field through the drainpipe and therefore a smaller N load leaves the drain, even if there is no change in nitrate concentration. According to the above-mentioned study performed in Lithuania (Ramoška et al. Citation2011), when the authors controlled the groundwater level at the drain outlet, the duration of annual drainage flow was reduced by 40%–62%. At the same time, the flow volume itself was reduced by 25% and the nitrate load by 20%–28%, in comparison with the flow in CD systems. These indices are variable depending on the weather conditions: in dry years, the differences between treatments are higher and in wetter years lower.

In Lithuania, where subsurface drainage systems are adapted for water removal only, the maintenance of optimal groundwater tables for agricultural crops is complicated. However, through the installation of CWD systems, more effective use of rainfall, soil moisture storage and reductions in nutrient losses can be achieved. Other possibilities of reducing NO3 in agricultural drainage, like the installation of wood-based denitrification bioreactors, show promise (Povilaitis et al. Citation2011). However, they have only been investigated in laboratory studies and need to be examined in practice.

Management of open drain ditches: Preconditions for re-naturalisation

Although landscape can be damaged by land drainage, it is also capable of recovery (i.e. rehabilitating itself). Numerous patterns show this capability, which involves, in various ways, geodynamic, hydrological, biological and geochemical processes leading to soil conservation, bed process stabilisation, biota diversity and water quality improvements. It can also reduce the costs of ditch maintenance while increasing biodiversity.

The investigations of the processes in and around the drainage ditches were mostly conducted in the Nevėžis River basin in the Middle Lithuanian Lowland, within a territory of about 2600 km2, where 545 random stretches of ditches were surveyed (Lamsodis & Poškus Citation2006; Lamsodis, Morkūnas et al. Citation2006). The age of the ditches, their catchment areas and the longitudinal gradients of beds in the selected stretches ranged from 14 years to 52 years, 0.1–40.8 km2 and 0.5% to 7.5%. The dominant soils were of different textures: from sand to clay loam, with some occurrences of peat soil.

The study results revealed that long-operating ditches with grassland herbs botanically close to those introduced on the newly constructed ditch slopes make up about 20% to 25% of all the ditches (Lamsodis & Poškus Citation2006). In the remaining ditches, the communities of other herbs and phorbs that are better able to grow on poor slope soils succeeded grassland herbs.

Vegetation occupied the beds of about 80% of ditches as well (Lamsodis & Poškus Citation2006). Many of these ditches have smaller catchments. The herbs stopped growing in the beds when the ditch catchments reached areas A ± SE = 8.8 ± 1.5 km2. If the catchment area is rather small, A ± SE = 1.2 ± 0.1 km2, and even willow shrubs (Salix spp. L.) are able to grow in the bed of the ditch (Lamsodis & Poškus Citation2006). The occurrence of woody vegetation appeared to be much more frequent on ditch slopes than in beds, close to 63% to 79% (Lamsodis Citation2002; Lamsodis & Poškus Citation2006). In total, there were 36 species belonging to 22 genera and 13 families found growing in the area (Lamsodis Citation2002). The diversity of woody species and the chance of finding them on the slopes of ditches increase gradually with the approach of ditches to forests (Lamsodis Citation2002). Actually, this increase, as well as the succession of herbaceous vegetation on ditch slopes, evidences the ditches’ efforts to retrieve their functions as refuges and ecological corridors for plant and animal life in agro-landscapes (Lamsodis Citation2002; Lamsodis, Morkūnas et al. Citation2006).

The annual increase of sediment in the small ditches of low longitudinal gradient (<1‰) in sandy loam and loam soils was found to be about 3–4 cm (Šukys & Poškus Citation1998). They also found that the sediment accumulation increased when the ditch bed was grass-covered, but it was 1.4 to 2.7 times less if the ditch slopes exhibited woody vegetation. The researchers related this phenomenon to a choking effect of woody vegetation on bed grasses.

The more comprehensive investigations demonstrated that the ditch bed-silting rate averages 1.9 ± 0.1 cm year−1 (Lamsodis, Poškus et al. Citation2006). The rate abates up to 1.17 ± 0.18 cm year−1 when there is no grass cover on the ditch bed, but increases up to 2.02 ± 0.13 cm year−1 if the grassy cover is present (Lamsodis & Poškus Citation2006). If the slopes exhibit woody vegetation, the increase of density by one stem per sq. metre results in a decrease in the silting rate by about 0.6 cm ().

Figure 7. Dependence of sedimentation rate (Δh, diamonds) and sediment organic matter percentage (OM, squares) in ditches on the density of slope woody vegetation (D). ‘Antennae’ mark SE and thin solid and dotted lines mark the confidence bounds of regressions at p = 0.05 (Lamsodis, Morkūnas et al. Citation2006).
Figure 7. Dependence of sedimentation rate (Δh, diamonds) and sediment organic matter percentage (OM, squares) in ditches on the density of slope woody vegetation (D). ‘Antennae’ mark SE and thin solid and dotted lines mark the confidence bounds of regressions at p = 0.05 (Lamsodis, Morkūnas et al. Citation2006).

The percentage of field erosion products and wintertime deflation products entering the ditch sediment make up 35% and 5% respectively (Lamsodis, Poškus et al. Citation2006). Račinskas (Citation1983) estimated that almost all of the soil erosion products (66%–96%) tended to accumulate in riparian buffers, and these products contained more key nutrients (NPK), about 90%–95%, than did the surface run-off. The roots of woody vegetation and decaying fallen leaves and branches strengthened slopes, making them more resistant to slumps and erosion and improved the filtration properties of soil assisting in the interception of the dissolved pollutants (Danilov et al. Citation1980; Vought et al. Citation1994).

Usually, the ditches are clogged by snow. Woody vegetation on a ditch slope, as shown by Vaikasas and Lamsodis (Citation2007), assisted with the interception of about 2.5 m3 m−1 of snow in the riparian zone along the ditch. This contributed to the overgrown ditch preserving about 2.9 m3 m−1 of ditch channel free of snow, although the winter was fairly snowy. The snow pack depth averaged 50 cm in the field and the probability equalled 3% (). However, the next ditch of similar dimensions was snowed in completely.

Figure 8. Snowdrift profiles formed in the Pakruostė-4 ditch in 1996. 1–4 – profiles measured on 22 January, 14 February and 6 and 20 March; grey fields mark rough spaces overgrown by trees; stem density averages 1.2 ps. m–2; height of trees averages 5.4 m over upper edges of slopes (Vaikasas & Lamsodis Citation2007).
Figure 8. Snowdrift profiles formed in the Pakruostė-4 ditch in 1996. 1–4 – profiles measured on 22 January, 14 February and 6 and 20 March; grey fields mark rough spaces overgrown by trees; stem density averages 1.2 ps. m–2; height of trees averages 5.4 m over upper edges of slopes (Vaikasas & Lamsodis Citation2007).

Overgrown slopes not only preserve ditches from suspended sediment and chemical pollution but also assist in decreasing the concentrations of nutrients when water flows in sequence via non-overgrown and overgrown ditch stretches. The differences found in one study were not significant and did not exceed 4%–18% (Lamsodis, Morkūnas et al. Citation2006; Lamsodis et al. Citation2009). Nevertheless, they do indicate that ditch water quality does not get worse in the ambience of woody vegetation.

Unfortunately, woody vegetation growing on slopes determines the lower hydraulic capacity of the ditch. In current drainage systems, however, the depth of most ditches depends on the depth of subsurface collectors, which results in much deeper ditches with cross-section dimensions several times larger than those that would occur if they were determined by hydraulic calculations. It makes up the very reserve to compensate for the decrease in hydraulic capacity caused by woody vegetation. If a lack of hydraulic capacity still occurs, some measure can be taken: (1) all trees can be cut away from the bottom part of either slope; (2) dense woody vegetation cover can be thinned out on one of the entire slopes; (3) all woody vegetation can be cut down on one entire slope; and (4) all woody vegetation can simply be removed from both slopes (Rimkus et al. Citation2003).

In the spring of 1993, an experiment was conducted to overgrow the slopes of the Graisupis-1 ditch. Although there was no additional preparation of the slope's surface, and no staking, no watering, and no fertilisation were applied, about 70% of the 16 native species of trees planted produced roots and developed successfully. After eight years, they started to suppress and maintain the suppression of the herbaceous vegetation on the ditch bed over successive years (). The annual increase in sediment depth was reduced from 4.20 cm year−1 in 1994–1996 to 0.05–0.18 cm year−1 in 1997–2008. In 2013, after a 20-year growing period, the trees overgrew the ditch channel by about 10.5 m (max. 13.5 m) and currently resemble a field shelterbelt (), the wood volume of which is approximately 5.9 m3 per 10 m of the ditch's length. Thus, the shelterbelt that has formed on the slopes of the Graisupis-1 ditch is able to suppress bed vegetation all over, markedly decrease sedimentation and make the slopes require no mowing.

Figure 9. Two views of the same stretch of Graisupis-1 ditch demonstrating: (a) suppressing effect of trees 12 years after planting on growth of bed vegetation, taken in 2005 (photo: V. Poškus); and (b) field shelterbelt formed over ditch channel over 16 years, taken in 2009 (photo: R. Lamsodis).
Figure 9. Two views of the same stretch of Graisupis-1 ditch demonstrating: (a) suppressing effect of trees 12 years after planting on growth of bed vegetation, taken in 2005 (photo: V. Poškus); and (b) field shelterbelt formed over ditch channel over 16 years, taken in 2009 (photo: R. Lamsodis).

The bidirectional character of the above-discussed effects leads not only to the environmental recovery of ditches as ecological corridors and refuges for native plant and animal life in an agro-landscape, as well as the preservation of soils from physical and chemical denudation and waters from pollution, but also the maintenance of their function to collect and discharge water from drainage systems (there is no need for slope mowing and no or a reduced need for sediment dragging; the cross-section of the ditch becomes more stable).

Summary

Artificial land drainage, which occupies 87% of the agricultural land area in Lithuania, has significantly altered the local environment. Although the economic benefit gained from drained agricultural land has substantially increased, this activity has led to a direct loss of habitat and biodiversity. Along with the concurrent land-use changes, such as the conversion of wetlands to agricultural land, the presence of drainage has, to some extent, affected the pattern of flow in streams and accelerated nutrient losses from the soil with subsequent enrichment of N and P in surface waters. Because of drainage, the natural vegetation area has rapidly decreased and large open spaces have appeared in the landscape. The patchiness and former mosaic land-use structure have been significantly lessened.

The introduction of drainage has altered the time and frequency of high stream flows in particular (i.e. the extent of tile drainage in a river catchment led to a longer duration of high pulses and the later occurrence of annual peaks, as well as showing a link to a decreasing number of low pulses). The extended duration of high pulses, along with the lag in the occurrence of annual peaks, can be attributed to the ‘sponge’ effect of drainage. The decreasing number of low pulses suggests that an efficient hydrological connectivity with the groundwater in the river catchment may exist through tile drainage.

Since the 1970s, upward trends in precipitation amounts during the cold season (November–March) and downward trends during the warm season (April–October) have been observed in Lithuania. The average seasonal spring, summer and autumn air temperatures have also tended to increase. For the winter season, this has caused alterations in the precipitation pattern turning from snowfall to rainfall. Altogether, it has resulted in increasing trends of drainage run-off in winter. Consequently, the increased run-off in the winter period raises new questions regarding how to find solutions to the problem related to increased nutrient run-off.

Numerous investigations have demonstrated that nutrient losses through drainage systems may considerably increase, primarily because of the irrational and unbalanced fertilisation rates. However, areas with perennial grass cover can ensure a higher nutrient uptake and fewer losses of nutrients via drainage systems than can areas with row and grain crops.

The changes in land use and ploughing of permanent grass cover, however, substantially contribute to increased nitrate losses from the soil. It has also been determined that organic agriculture has no essential advantage compared with intensive agriculture, considering the amount of nutrients leached via drainage systems. Furthermore, in the areas receiving increased slurry and liquid manure from big farms, slurry application in spring resulted in reduced losses of N and P by 17% and 36%, respectively, in comparison with the same application rates in autumn. The highest amounts of nutrients are leached out via drainage in the fields with slurry and liquid manure applications during cold periods of the year, when the soil is without crops, and there is more rainfall. In reduced tillage treatments, nitrate leaching through drainage systems is 25%–33% lower compared with conventional tillage. The largest differences between the treatments are observed during wintertime.

Experiments with clayey soil treatment with lime amendments revealed that it may significantly prevent P losses. Differences of up to three times were found between phosphate concentrations in CD outflow and the treatments where the lime of 0.6% CaO for soil mass was added to the trench backfill.

Although CWD as a water management practice is still not applied in Lithuania, in agricultural areas with a potentially high diffuse pollution load, it can be beneficial. A few research studies reveal that in CWD outflows NO3−N concentrations are, on average, 5%–13% lower than in CD. The reduction in NO3−N loads is achieved primarily because of the reduction in outflow volume. Therefore, under CWD conditions, the NO3−N load is reduced by 20%–28% in comparison with the conditions under CD. These peculiarities are weather-dependent: in dry years, the differences between the treatments are higher, and in wetter years, lower.

Natural processes which occur in and around open ditches as well as the possibility of supporting these processes intentionally lead (1) to their environmental recovery as ecological corridors and refuges for native plant and animal life; (2) are able to assist in soil preservation from physical and chemical denudation and protect water from pollution; and (3) sustain the practical value of reducing the costs of maintaining the capacity of ditches to collect and discharge water.

References

  • Agriculture in Lithuania. 2000. Developments and perspectives. 2001. Vilnius: Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics.
  • Aksomaitienė R, Rukšėnas B, Strusevičienė S. 1978. Nauchnaja Technicheskaja Konferenciya Puti Sovershenstvovaniya Projektirovaniya Stroitelstva i Ekspluatacii Dozdevalnych System Na Osushajemych Zemliach [The impact of fertilization by slurry on chemical composition of drainage water]. Vilnius (Lithuania): Pergalė Press. Russian.
  • Aleknavičius P. 1989. Žemės kadastras [Land cadastre]. Vilnius: Mokslas. Lithuanian.
  • Aškinis S, Čižauskienė M, Misevičienė S, Strusevičius Z. 1999. [Influence of soil drainage intensity on drainage water pollution in the fields receiving slurry]. Water Manag Eng. 7:136–145. Lithuanian.
  • Aškinis S, Misevičienė S. 2003. [Ecological aspects of slurry application]. Water Manag Eng. 23–24:177–184. Lithuanian.
  • Augeard B, Kao C, Chaumont C, Vauclin M. 2005. Mechanisms of surface runoff genesis on a subsurface drained soil affected by surface crusting: a field investigation. Phys Chem Earth. 30:598–610. 10.1016/j.pce.2005.07.014
  • Baigys G, Bastienė N, Ulen B. 2011. Effect of tillage systems on soil hydrophysical properties and drainage flow. Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific Conference Rural Development; 2011 Nov 24–25; Akademija-Kaunas (Lithuania): Spalvų kraitė Publishing.
  • Baigys G, Gaigalis K, Kutra G, Marculanienė J, Feizienė D, Feiza V. 2007. [Impact of reduced tillage on soil humidity and leaching of nitrate-nitrogen]. Water Manag Eng. 32:5–15. Lithuanian.
  • Baker DB, Richards RP, Loftus TT, Kramer JW. 2004. A new flashiness index: characteristics and applications to Midwestern Rivers and streams. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 40:504–522.
  • Bastienė N, Gurklys V. 2007. Principles and criteria of evaluation of drained land. Transactions of Estonian University of Life Sciences. Baltic Surveying ’07. Estonian Univ Life Sci. 224:28–43.
  • Bastienė N, Mickunas D, Šaulys V. 2011. Seasonal changes of phosphorus concentrations in drainage water when backfill treated with lime. In: Cygas D, Froehner KD, editors. Selected Papers of the 8th International Conference Environmental Engineering; 2011 May 19–20; Vilnius (Lithuania): Technika Press.
  • Bormann H. 2010. Runoff regime changes in German rivers due to climate change. Erdkunde. 64:257–279. 10.3112/erdkunde.2010.03.04
  • Bučienė A, Antanaitis A, Mašauskienė A, Šimanskaitė D. 2007. Nutrients N, P losses with drainage runoff and field balance as a result of crop management. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 38:2177–2195.
  • Buivydaitė V, Vaičys M, Juodis J. 1999. Lietuvos dirvožemių klasifikacija. DKL_99LT [Classification of soils in Lithuania]. Kaunas: LŽŪU Leidybos centras. Lithuanian.
  • Bukantis A, Gedžiūnas P, Giedraitienė J, Ignatavičius G, Jonynas J, Kavaliauskas P, Lazauskienė J, Reipšleger R, Sakalauskienė G, Sinkevičius S, et al. 2008. Lietuvos gamtinė aplinka, būklė, procesai ir raida [Lithuania's environment, status, processes and trends]. Vilnius: Environmental Protection Agency. Lithuanian.
  • Buožis V, Bastienė N. 1998. [Investigations of the maintenance efficiency of land reclamation systems]. Water Manag Eng. 5:66–79. Lithuanian.
  • Čeičys J, Sklėrius P, Šileika V. 1970. Melioracija Lietuvoje 1919–1939 [Land reclamation in Lithuania in 1919–1939]. In: Dabužinskas K, editor. Melioracija Lietuvoje [Land reclamation in Lithuania]. Vilnius: Mintis; p. 23–44. Lithuanian.
  • Čižauskienė M, Misevičienė S. 2001. [Ecological assessment of the application of slurry in gardening]. Garden Hort. 20:80–90. Lithuanian.
  • Čižauskienė M, Strusevičius Z, Stukonytė V. 1998. [The influence of slurry on crop productivity and quantity of nutrients leached via subsurface drainage]. Water Manag Eng. 5:175–185. Lithuanian.
  • Danilov GG, Lobanov DA, Kargin IP. 1980. Effektivnost agrolesomelioratsii v Nechernozemnoi zone RSFSR [Effectiveness of Agricultural Afforestation in Non-Chernizem Zone of RFSR]. Moscow: Lesnaya Promishlennost Publishers. Russian.
  • Dumbrauskas A, Iritz L, Larsson R, Povilaitis A. 1998. Environmental effects of agriculture practices: hydrology and nutrient transport. Part I – Water Cycle. Report 3218. Sweden: Lund University.
  • Dumbrauskas A, Larsson R. 1993. Effects of changes in land use on runoff in the Nevežis River basin, Lithuania. Report 3173. Sweden: Lund University.
  • Evans RO, Skaggs W, Gilliam W. 1995. Controlled versus conventional drainage effects on water quality. J Irrig Drain Eng. 121:271–276. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1995)121:4(271)
  • Feiza V, Feizienė D, Auškalnis A, Kadžienė G. 2010. Sustainable tillage: results from long-term field experiments on Cambisol. Agriculture. 97:3–14.
  • Forman RTT. 1995. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecol. 10:133–142.
  • Galvonaitė A, Valiukas D, Kilpys J. 2013. Lietuvos klimato atlasas [Climate atlas of Lithuania]. Vilnius: Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service. Lithuanian
  • Gužys S. 2002. Environmental assessment of cropping intensity. Ekologija. 4:39–48.
  • Gužys S. 2012. [Influence of different intensity cropping systems on nitrogen leaching by drainage]. Water Manag Eng. 41:46–56. Lithuanian.
  • Gužys S. 2013. [The cycles of phosphorus and potassium in crop rotations differing in fertilization]. Water Manag Eng. 42:40–48. Lithuanian.
  • Gužys S, Petrokienė Z. 2006. [The influence of the crop rotation differing in fertilisation on phosphorus migration in agroecosystem]. Agriculture. 93:75–88. Lithuanian.
  • Gužys S, Petrokienė Z. 2008a. [The effect of different soil use practice on mineral nitrogen leaching]. Water Manag Eng. 33:5–13. Lithuanian.
  • Gužys S, Petrokienė Z. 2008b. [Soil use practice impact on mineral phosphorus leaching]. Water Manag Eng. 34:39–47. Lithuanian.
  • Hirsch RM, Walker JF, Day JC, Kallio R. 1990. The influence of man on hydrological systems. In: Wolman MG, Riggs HC, editors. Surface water hydrology. Boulder, Colo: Geological Society of America; p. 329–359.
  • Hoorman J, Hone T, Sudman T Jr, Dirksen T, Iles J, Islam KR. 2008. Agricultural impacts on lake and stream water quality in Grand Lake St. Marys, Western Ohio. Water Air Soil Poll. 193:309–322. 10.1007/s11270-008-9692-1
  • Jablonskis J. 2001. Hidrografija [Hydrography]. In: Gailiušis B, Jablonskis J, Kovalenkovienė M, editors. Lietuvos upės. Hidrografija ir nuotėkis [Lithuanian rivers. Hydrography and runoff]. Kaunas: Lithuanian Energy Institute Press; p. 39–76. Lithuanian.
  • Jakimavičius D, Kriaučiūnienė J. 2013. The climate change impact on the water balance of the Curonian Lagoon. Water Resour. 40:202–214. 10.1134/S0097807813020097
  • Jay DA, Naik PK. 2011. Distinguishing human and climate influences on hydrological disturbance processes in the Columbia River, USA. Hydrol Sci J. 56:1186–1209. 10.1080/02626667.2011.604324
  • Juozapaitis A, Zelionkienė V. 1997. [Anthropogenic influence on water balance change and ways to detect its effect]. Proc Lithuanian Inst Water Manag. 2:78–81. Lithuanian.
  • Katkevičius L, Ciūnys A, Maziliauskas A, Vačiukynas V. 1998. [Investigation on the efficiency of privatization of land reclamation equipment]. Water Manag Eng. 4:57–68. Lithuanian.
  • Kriaučiūnienė J, Meilutytė-Barauskienė D, Rimkus E, Kažys J, Vincevičius A. 2008. Climate change impact on hydrological processes in Lithuanian Nemunas river basin. Baltica. 21:51–61.
  • Lalonde V, Madramootoo CA, Trenholm, Broughton RS. 1996. Effect of controlled drainage on nitrate concentrations in subsurface drain discharge. Agr Water Manag. 29:187–199. 10.1016/0378-3774(95)01193-5
  • Lamsodis R. 2002. [Botanical structure and sped of woody vegetation in drainage channels]. Water Manag Eng. 20:31–40. Lithuanian.
  • Lamsodis R, Morkūnas V, Poškus V, Povilaitis A. 2006. Ecological approach to management of open drains. Irrig Drain. 55:479–490. 10.1002/ird.274
  • Lamsodis R, Poškus V. 2006. Vegetation in drainage channels: interface with sediment accumulation. Water Manag Eng. 3:60–68.
  • Lamsodis R, Poškus V, Ragauskas S. 2006. [Sediment accumulation in drainage channels: sources, rate of silting, composition]. Selected papers of the Conference Advanced Methods and Solutions in Water Engineering; 2006; Birštonas (Lithuania): LŽŪU Leidybos centras. Lithuanian.
  • Lamsodis R, Povilaitis A, Poškus V, Ragauskas S. 2009. Lessons that nature urges people to learn: experience from open drain research. In: Pardue GH, Olvera TK, editors. Ecological restoration. New York: Nova Science; p. 185–205.
  • Lukianienė D. 1973. [Effect of land drainage on maximum spring runoff in Lithuanian SSR rivers]. Hydrometeorol Art. 3:47–53. Lithuanian.
  • Macevičius J, Lukianienė D. 1975. [Effect of land drainage on average annual runoff in Lithuanian SSR]. Hydrometeorol Art. 7:33–45. Lithuanian.
  • Mališauskas A, Haneklaus S, Sileika AS. 2005. Nitrogen leaching from grassland in Lithuania. Landbauforschung Völkenrode. 55:71–78.
  • Marčėnas V. 1991. [Effect of land drainage and intensified agriculture on river runoff]. Reg Hydrometeorol. 14:33–45. Lithuanian.
  • Matteau M, Assani AA, Mesfioui M. 2009. Application of multivariate statistical analysis methods to the dam hydrologic impact studies. J Hydrol. 371:120–128. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.022
  • Miseckaitė O. 2010. Influence of precipitation and air temperature on the amount of drainage run-off. Vagos. 88:63–70.
  • Miseckaite O, Gurklys V. 2011. The trends of drainage runoff change in loam soils during a multiyear period. In: Cygas D, Froehner KD, editors. Selected Papers of the 8th International Conference in Environmental Engineering; 2011 May 19–20; Vilnius (Lithuania): Technika Press.
  • Misevičienė S. 2002. Investigations of nutrient leaching in drained soils where slurry was applied [doctoral thesis]. Vilainiai: Lithuanian Institute of Water Management. Lithuanian
  • Misevičienė S. 2004. [Environmental evaluation of slurry application on agricultural fields]. Water Manag Eng. 26:12–18. Lithuanian.
  • Misevičienė S. 2005. [Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on nutrient leaching]. Water Manag Eng. 281:102–111. Lithuanian.
  • Misevičienė S. 2006. [Seasonal changes of nutrients in drainage water]. Water Manag Eng. 3:52–59. Lithuanian.
  • Misevičienė S. 2007. [Influence of fertilizing on nitrogen variation and losses in a field‘s crop rotation]. Water Manag Eng. 31:27–35. Lithuanian.
  • Misevičienė S. 2012. [The impact of fertilization with manure from big livestock companies on drainage and surface water quality]. Water Manag Eng. 40:73–82. Lithuanian.
  • Misevičienė S. 2013. [The changes of phosphorus concentrations in drainage water after fertilizing fields with manure]. Water Manag Eng. 42:55–60. Lithuanian.
  • Morkūnas V, Ramoška E. 2001. [Investigation on drainage runoff regulation]. Water Manag Eng. 16:53–60. Lithuanian.
  • Morkunas V, Rudzianskaite A, Sukys P. 2005. Influence of agriculture on soil water quality in the karst region of Lithuania. Irrig Drain. 54:353–361. 10.1002/ird.179
  • Murphy PNC, Stevens RJ. 2010. Lime and gypsum as source measures to decrease phosphorus loss from soils to water. Water Air Soil Poll. 212:101–111. 10.1007/s11270-010-0325-0
  • Ouarda TBMJ, Girard C, Cavadias GS, Bobee B. 2001. Regional flood frequency estimation with canonical correlation analysis. J Hydrol. 254:157–173. 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00488-7
  • Pauliukevičius G, Juodis J. 1987. [Estimation of land in danger of deflation]. In: USSR Academy of Sciences and Soviet Committee for the UNESCO Program ‘Man and Biosphere’, editors. Ecological optimisation of the agrolandscape. Moscow: Nauka Publishers; p. 71–74. Russian.
  • Povilaitis A. 2000. Evaluation of the influence of tile drainage on nitrogen lossess – numerical experiment approach. Water Manag Eng. 32:18–38.
  • Povilaitis A. 2001. [Historical and territorial peculiarities of Lithuanian agricultural landscape]. Vagos. 52:62–72. Lithuanian.
  • Povilaitis A. 2002. The development of land reclamation GIS in Lithuania. NHP Series. 47:59–67.
  • Povilaitis A, Taminskas J, Gulbinas Z, Linkevičienė R, Pileckas M. 2011. Lietuvos šlapynės ir jų vandensauginė reikšmė [Lithuanian wetlands and their water protective importance]. Vilnius: Apyaušris. Lithuanian.
  • Povilaitis A. Forthcoming 2014. Hydrological effect of artificial drainage in lowland river catchments in Lithuania. Environ Eng Manag J. 12.
  • Račinskas A, Beliauskas P. 1987. [Antierosional resistance]. In: Volkov K, editor. USSR Academy of Sciences and Soviet Committee for the UNESCO Program ‘Man and Biosphere’. Ecological optimisation of the agrolandscape. Moscow: Nauka Publishers; p. 62–71. Russian.
  • Račinskas A. 1983. [Determination of expedient width of riparian buffer strips]. In: Lukianas A, editor. Protection and reasonable use of water bodies. Vilnius: Mokslas; p. 82–98. Russian.
  • Ramoska E, Bastiene N, Saulys V. 2011. Evaluation of controlled drainage efficiency in Lithuania. Irrig Drain. 60:196–206. 10.1002/ird.548
  • Ramoška E, Morkūnas V. 2006. [Influence of drainage runoff regulation on soil water regime]. Water Manag Eng. 30:5–14. Lithuanian.
  • Reclaimed land and hydraulic structures. 2014. [Information booklet. State land survey]. Vilnius. Lithuanian.
  • Rencher AC. 2002. Methods of multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.
  • Rhoton FE, Bigham JM. 2005. Phosphate adsorption by ferrihydrite-amended soils. J Environ Qual. 34:890–896. 10.2134/jeq2004.0176
  • Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP. 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol. 10:1163–1174. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041163.x
  • Rimkus E, Kažys J, Junevičiūtė J, Stonevičius E. 2007. The forecast of Lithuanian climate change in twenty-first century. Geografija. 43:37–47.
  • Rimkus A, Lamsodis R, Vaikasas S. 2003. Naturalization of drainage channels in Lithuania and possibilities of their maintenance as water recipients. Nord Hydrol. 34:493–506.
  • Rimšelis J, Šleinys R. 1996. Augalų maisto medžiagų išplovimas iš įvairių dirvožemių [Migration of chemical substances in different soils of Lithuania]. Vokė: Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture. Lithuanian
  • Robinson M. 1990. Impact of improved land drainage on river flows. Report 113. Wallingford: Institute of Hydrology.
  • Rudzianskaite A. 2011. Changes of drainage run-off hydrological regime in glacial lacustrine clays of karst zone. In: Cygas D, Froehner KD, editors. Selected Papers of the 8th International Conference Environmental Engineering; 2011 May 19–20; Vilnius (Lithuania): Technika Press.
  • Rudzianskaite A, Miseviciene S. 2005. Nitrate nitrogen leaching in different agroecosystems (in karst zone and Middle Lithuania). J Water Land Develop. 9:123–133.
  • Ruminaitė R. 2010. Research and evaluation of the anthropogenic activity impact on the river runoff and water quality [dissertation]. Vilnius (Lithuania): Vilnius Gediminas Technical University. Lithuanian.
  • Šaulys V, Bastienė N. 2006. The effect of lime admixture to trench backfill on the functioning of tile drainage in heavy soils. Irrig Drain. 55:373–382.
  • Šaulys V, Bastienė N. 2007. The impact of lime admixture into trench backfill on the variation of phosphorus in drainage outflow. Irrig Drain. 56:99–105.
  • Šaulys V, Bastienė N. 2008. The impact of lime on water quality when draining clay soils. Ekologija. 54:22–28.
  • Šaulys V, Lukianas A. 2003. [Perspectives of the exploitation of land reclamation structures in the context of rural economic problems]. J Environ Eng Landscape Manag. 11:Ia–Ih. Lithuanian.
  • Šileika AS, Gužys S. 2003. Drainage runoff and migration of elements in the organic and conventional cropping system. Agronomie. 23:633–641.
  • Skaggs RW, Breve MA, Gilliam JW. 1994. Hydrologic and water quality impacts of agricultural drainage. Crit Rev Environ Sci Tech. 24:1–32. 10.1080/10643389409388459
  • Stålnacke P, Bechmann M. 2002. Trends in nutrient runoff from agricultural basins in Norway. Agricultural effects on ground and surface waters. Res Edge Sci Soc. 273:267–271.
  • Stukonytė V. 1996. [Methods and efficiency of utilizing pig breeding complex effluent on fodder rotation crops]. Water Manag Eng. 1:89–95. Lithuanian.
  • Šukys P, Poškus V. 1998. [Effect of sedimend accumulation on deformation of ditch channels]. Water Manag Eng. 5:130–141. Lithuanian.
  • Švedas A, Šleinys R, Ežerinskas V. 2001. Augalų maisto medžiagų išsiplovimas [Plant nutrient leaching]. In: Eidukevičienė M, Vasiliauskienė V, editors. Lietuvos dirvožemiai [Soils of Lithuania]. Vilnius: Lietuvos Mokslas; p. 750–762. Lithuanian.
  • Vaikasas S, Lamsodis R. 2007. Snowdrift formation in forested open drains: field study and modelling patterns. Nord Hydrol. 38:425–440.
  • Vaitkevičius F. 1989. [Hydrographical network, land reclamation and landscape]. Theses of Scientific-Technical Conference Ecological Problems and Their Solving in Lithuania; 1989 Oct; Vilnius (Lithuania): MTIPP Centras. Lithuanian.
  • Van den Eertwegh GAPH, Nieber JL, de Louw PGB, Van Hardeveld HA, Bakkum R. 2006. Impacts of drainage activities for clay soils on hydrology and solute loads to surface water. Irrig Drain. 55:235–245. 10.1002/ird.256
  • Vasinauskas P. 1950. Tillage methods [dissertation]. Dotnuva: Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture. Lithuanian.
  • Vought LBM, Hahl J, Pedersen CL, Lacoursiere JO. 1994. Nutrient retention in riparian ecotones. Ambio. 23:342–348.
  • Wesström I, Ekbohm G, Linnér H, Messing I. 2003. The effects of controlled drainage on subsurface outflow from level agricultural fields. Hydrol Process. 17:1525–1538.
  • Zalakevicius M. 2001. Lithuanian rivers: on the way from degradation to restoration. In: Nijland HJ, Cals, MJR, editors. River restoration in Europe: practical approaches. Proceedings of Conference on River Restoration; Wageningen (The Netherlands): Evers Litho & Druk Publishing.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.