Interventions to improve utilization of cataract surgical services by girls: Case studies from Asia and Africa

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Gender and blindness initiatives continue to make eye care personnel aware of the service utilization inequity strongly favouring men, yet interventions to reduce that inequity, particularly for girls, are under developed.

Methods: This descriptive study gathered quantitative data on the degree of gender equity at five Child Eye Health Tertiary Facilities (CEHTFs) in Asia and Africa and conducted in-depth interviews with eye care personnel to assess their strategies and capacity to reduce gender inequity. Cataract surgery was utilized to assess the degree of inequity and success of interventions to reduce inequity in case finding, service utilization, and follow-up.

Results: CEHTF administrative data showed significant gender inequity in cataract surgical services favouring boys in all settings. CEHTFs actively seek children through community and school-based outreach, yet do not have initiatives to reduce gender inequity. Little gender inequity was found among children receiving surgical and follow-up care, although two out of three children were boys. CEHTF staff, despite being aware, offered no effective means to reduce gender inequity involving cataract surgical services. Interventions that successfully increased service utilization by girls came from individual cases, involving extraordinary effort by a single eye care programme person.

Conclusion: Community-based case finders such as Anganwadi workers in India, Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs) in Nepal, and Key Informants (KIs) in Africa are necessary to identify children in need of cataract services, but insufficient to increase service utilization by girls. Secondary, often extra-ordinary community-based interventions by eye care personnel are needed in all settings.

Funding

This manuscript has been made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

None of the authors have any proprietary interests or conflicts of interest related to this submission.

This submission has not been published anywhere previously and that it is not simultaneously being considered for any other publication.

Additional information

Funding

This manuscript has been made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). None of the authors have any proprietary interests or conflicts of interest related to this submission. This submission has not been published anywhere previously and that it is not simultaneously being considered for any other publication.