86
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Pediatric Case Finding in Madagascar: A Controlled, Prospective Population-based Assessment of Key Informant Productivity and Cost

, , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 408-415 | Received 11 Mar 2019, Accepted 29 Jun 2019, Published online: 05 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The Key Informant (KI) case finding method, which trains community members to screen children for eye problems and refer them to eye services, is a common strategy to identify and refer children with blindness and visual impairment. However, studies to date have not determined the benefit and cost of adding KIs to routine outreach activities.

Methods: Four eye programs in Madagascar with established outreach camps added KIs to a portion of their camps distributed equally throughout their service region over a one year period. KIs recorded children screened and their attendance at an outreach camp. Outreach personnel used standardized registration forms to gather age, sex, visual acuity, diagnosis and treatment data. Costs were gathered for the KI program and outreach camps.

Results: In one year, the 4 eye programs held 138 outreach camps, 43 with KIs. The KI camps were more productive than regular camps seeing an average of 61 and 24 children and 50 and 19 children with an eye problem, for KI and regular camps, respectively. The KI camps also saw more children with moderate or severe visual impairment or blindness with 21 and 8 children (per 10 camps) for KI and regular camps, respectively. A KI camp cost $463 ($642 vs. $179) more than a regular camp and $3 ($8 vs. $11) more per child seen.

Conclusion: The KI method significantly increased the number of children attending outreach camps, at all levels of visual impairment and blindness, at a modest increase in costs.

Financial support

This manuscript has been made possible by Seva Canada. None of the authors have any proprietary interests or conflicts of interest related to this submission. This submission has not been published anywhere previously and is not simultaneously being considered for any other publication.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Seva Canada.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.