244
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Epidemiology and Outcomes Following Open Globe Injury in Agricultural Region, an 11-Year Experience

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 246-251 | Received 28 Nov 2019, Accepted 09 Jan 2020, Published online: 29 Jan 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To determine the characteristics and epidemiology of open globe injury (OGI) in a third referral centre over 11 years.

Methods

The study was a retrospective observational study. The medical records of 978 OGI cases (a total of 998 eyes), admitted to Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand from January 2006 to December 2016, were reviewed.

Results

The mean age (SD) of patients was 39.1 (17.5) years. Patients were predominantly male (867, 88.7%). The age with the highest incidence of injury ranged from 41 to 60 years, in both genders. Most injuries happened at the workplace (64.8%), with flying objects from electric grass trimmers (23.9%) being the major injury-related mechanism. Penetration injuries were found in 479 eyes (48.0%). In elderly group (aged >60 years), a higher proportion of a globe rupture injuries were observed (13.3%). In general, intraocular foreign body group presented with better initial visual acuity (VA) compared to other injury types (p< 0.001). In all types of injury, final VA was significantly improved after treatment. However, rupture and perforation globe injuries had significantly worse final VA outcomes, compared to penetration and intraocular foreign body injuries (p< 0.001). With multivariable regression analysis, poor initial VA (p< 0.001), type of injury (p= 0.028), positive relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) (p< 0.001), and endophthalmitis (p< 0.001) were associated with poor visual outcomes.

Conclusions

Work-related eye injury is a major cause of OGI. Poor initial VA, endophthalmitis, presence of RAPD, and rupture were the predictors for poor final visual outcomes.

Declaration of Interest

All the authors have no conflicts of interest.

This submission has not been published anywhere previously, and it is not simultaneously being considered for any other publications.

Additional information

Funding

The study was granted by the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (Grant number 145/2560).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.