318
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Prevalence of pediatric eye disease in the optumlabs data warehouse

, , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 537-544 | Received 03 Dec 2020, Accepted 15 Aug 2021, Published online: 29 Aug 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To define the prevalence of medical eye disease diagnoses among children enrolled in commercial insurance plans in the United States and to evaluate differences among groups based on the US census region, race/ethnicity, and familial net worth.

Methods

: Retrospective study of de-identified claims data from the OptumLab® Data Warehouse (OLDW) between 2007 and 2018. All children (<19 years) in the OLDW with coverage were studied and those with a claim for a significant eye disease (strabismus, amblyopia, nystagmus or structural eye disorders) with minimum 6-months follow-up were studied. Baseline characteristics were extracted for the calculation of eye disease prevalence, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, region of residence, and family net worth. The prevalence of each type of eye disease was calculated among all children and by baseline characteristics.

Results

: 10,759,066 children met the study criteria. The presence of any significant eye diagnosis was 6.7%. Disease was diagnosed more often in whites (6.9%) than blacks (5.6%) and Hispanics (5.9%). The most common eye disease diagnosed was strabismus (3.2%) followed by amblyopia (1.5%). In the North-East region, there was a 10.6% prevalence of any significant eye disease diagnosis, whereas in the Mid-West, it was 7.4% followed by the South and West (5.9% and 5.3%, respectively) (p < .001). There was an increase in eye disease diagnoses with increasing income (5.5% in<$25,000 and 9.4% in >$500,000 household net worth groups, p > .001).

Conclusion

: Diagnosis of significant eye diseases is relatively common in American children. The most common medical eye disease diagnosis is strabismus. Prevalence of eye disease diagnosis from claims data varies between geographical regions and different income groups. This may reflect differences in healthcare utilization rather than true disease prevalence.

Disclosure Statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

This submission has not been published anywhere previously and that it is not simultaneously being considered for any other publication.

Financial Support

NIH/NEI 5R21EY029655-02 (SLP), Unrestricted Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness (SLP, ALC, FGV).

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [5R21EY029655-02]; Research to Prevent Blindness.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.