Publication Cover
Child Neuropsychology
A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence
Volume 28, 2022 - Issue 7
582
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Multivariate base rates of score elevations on the BRIEF2 in children with ADHD, autism spectrum disorder, or specific learning disorder with impairment in reading

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 979-996 | Received 01 Nov 2021, Accepted 26 Mar 2022, Published online: 05 Apr 2022
 

ABSTRACT

There is a paucity of research examining multivariate base rates (MBRs) of elevated scores in pediatric rating scales of cognition. We present novel MBR information on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF2) for several clinical groups: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Combined Presentation (ADHD-C); ADHD Inattentive Presentation (ADHD-I); Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD); and Specific Learning Disorder with impairment in Reading (SLD-R). Participants included children diagnosed as having ADHD-C (n = 350), ADHD-I (n = 343), ASD (n = 390), or SLD-R (n = 240). Cumulative MBRs (e.g., the % of a sample having one or more elevated scores) were examined for each BRIEF2 form (Parent, Teacher, and Self-Report) and at three T-score cutoffs (T ≥ 60, T ≥ 65, and T ≥ 70). The MBR of obtaining at least one elevated score was common across clinical groups and forms at T ≥ 60 (ADHD-C = 90.5–98.1%; ADHD-I = 83.9–98.7%; ASD = 90.3–96.9%, SLD-R = 60.0–78.4%), T ≥ 65 (ADHD-C = 66.7–97.2%; ADHD-I = 77.5–94.9%; ASD = 77.3–92.7%; SLD-R = 38.5–64.0%), and T ≥ 70 (ADHD-C = 52.4–89.4%; ADHD-I = 64.8–84.2%; ASD = 54.5–83.2%; SLD-R = 26.9–44.1%). MBRs appeared to differ as a function of group (ADHD-C > ADHD-I > ASD > SLD-R) and form (Parent > Teacher > Self-Report) though future research with well-defined samples is needed to investigate this. We provide novel MBR information to enhance clinical interpretation of BRIEF2 data.

Disclosure statement

Gerard A. Gioia and Peter K. Isquith are authors of the BRIEF2 and receive royalties from the publisher (Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc). Jennifer Greene and Alicia Carrillo are employed by PAR. The other authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.