![Sample our Education journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5932/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Education.jpg"})
Abstract
Some of the most pressing problems currently facing chemical education throughout the world are rehearsed. It is suggested that if the notion of “context” is to be used as the basis for an address to these problems, it must enable a number of challenges to be met. Four generic models of “context” are identified that are currently used or that may be used in some form within chemical education as the basis for curriculum design. It is suggested that a model based on physical settings, together with their cultural justifications, and taught with a socio‐cultural perspective on learning, is likely to meet those challenges most fully. A number of reasons why the relative efficacies of these four models of approaches cannot be evaluated from the existing research literature are suggested. Finally, an established model for the representation of the development of curricula is used to discuss the development and evaluation of context‐based chemical curricula.
Acknowledgements
The author is very grateful to Astrid Bulte and Albert Pilot for their thoughtful, detailed, sustained, and constructive critiques of the several earlier versions of this paper.
