634
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Girls’ participation in science education: structural limitations and sustainable alternatives

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 1141-1161 | Received 05 Oct 2022, Accepted 05 Mar 2023, Published online: 15 Mar 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Efforts to attract and retain women in science are increasing, yet girls and women are persistently underrepresented in science education worldwide, limiting their preparation for, access to, and opportunities in science-related careers as adults. Based on qualitative research conducted in six secondary schools in Tanzania and informed by UNESCO's Ecological Framework for Female Participation in Science, this study explored structural limitations and sustainable alternatives to girls’ participation in science education. The study identified a number of structural limitations, including the dominance of patriarchal ideologies about science, the lack of female science teachers, inadequate resources for science learning and heavy domestic workloads. Similarly, increasing the supply of teaching and learning resources, motivating female students to study science, and raising awareness among students, teachers, parents and community members of the importance of girls’ participation in science education were identified as key sustainable alternatives. Overall, interventions to address cultural and social norms related to gender stereotypes and gender equality in policies, legislation, media and teachers’ pedagogical practices are essential to promote girls’ participation in science education.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Ethical statement

The current study met the ethics/human subject requirements of researchers’ institution at the time the data were collected. In addition to obtaining research approval to conduct the study, key ethical principles were adhered to in the current study, including informed consent, voluntary participation, respect for participants, participants’ right to withdraw, anonymity and confidentiality, and honesty.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Mkwawa University College of Education: [Grant Number MUCE-20177].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.