This work, a sequel to Panse et al. (1994), focuses on how students deal with transformations of time, distance, velocity and energy between frames of reference. Qualitative analysis of a free‐response test and of clinical interviews is combined with quantitative analysis of data on a forced‐option test. The results indicate that students frequently violate the ‘obvious’ invariance of time interval between fixed events, and take distance invariance for granted even for non‐simultaneous events. They tend to invoke a ‘physical drag’ picture instead of prescriptive transformation theory to view changes of quantities (especially velocity) from one frame to another. The diffuse meaning of ‘laws’ shows up variously. Laws are equated to trajectories; and conservation of energy is taken to mean its invariance, for observers, in relative motion.
Alternative conceptions in Galilean relativity: distance, time, energy and laws
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.