Consideration of Practice Education within a Regional Teaching Partnership Employing a Communities of Practice Lens

Abstract

This paper on practice education within a regional Teaching Partnership emanated from requests to consider how to progress its role and remit. It offers analysis of practice education within this context which may act as a starting point for exploring a broader understanding of practice education and its role in practice learning, supervision, recruitment and retention in England. This paper has materialised at a time of significant change, when the National Accreditation and Assessment System is anticipated and the Professional Capabilities Framework (PCF) and Practice Educator Professional Standards for Social Work (PEPS) are under review. It proposes an expanded role for practice education that could situate it as pivotal to promoting standards of supervision and cultures of learning within such changing contexts. A ‘communities of practice’ lens and a framework based on Caspi’s notions of structure, content and process are utilised to explore options for progress. This paper recognises that practice education, as both enterprise and system, is complex and messy and thus cautions against conceptualising it in simplistic terms. It concludes with suggestions to advance practice education and areas for further research. These are founded on establishing specialist practice educators and communities of practice within an overarching practice education consortium.

Keywords:

• practice education
• continuous professional development
• supervision
• communities of practice
• recruitment and retention
• teaching partnership
• leadership through knowledge

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Simon Haworth

Simon Haworth is a new academic at the University of Birmingham. Prior to his current post, he worked at a variety of levels within the statutory children and families social work field. His research interests include practice education, fathers in social work and social harm within social work.