2,655
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Predictions of in-situ melt pool geometric signatures via machine learning techniques for laser metal deposition

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 1345-1361 | Received 21 Aug 2021, Accepted 21 Feb 2022, Published online: 14 Mar 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Laser metal deposition (LMD) can produce near-net-shape components at high build-up rates for many applications, e.g. turbine blades, aerospace engine parts, and patient-specific implants. However, builds suffer from distortion and defects associated with ineffective process control. For example, melt pool features including height, depth, and dilution are transient, while process parameters including laser power, scanning speed, and powder feed rate remain constant in an open-loop LMD system. Improving product quality requires estimating these transient features to enable process control. This paper presents a semi-dynamic, data-driven framework to address this challenge. The framework correlates combined process parameters (laser power, scanning speed, powder feed rate, line energy density, specific energy density) and features from melt pool thermal images (melt pool width, area, mean temperature, maximum temperature) with hard-to-monitor, melt-pool-related features (height, depth, dilution). Sixty single-track experiments were conducted to acquire sensing data and dimensions of the track cross-sections. Significant input features for training machine learning (ML) models were selected based on Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results show that the correlation between hard-to-monitor melt-pool-wise features, combined process parameters, and limited in-situ sensing data are described well by the models presented here. Critically, an artificial neural network (ANN) showed the best performance.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and its Active Integrated Matter Future Science Platform (AIM FSP) [Testbed number: AIM FSP_TB10_WP05]. The authors also would like to acknowledge Hans Lohr and Con Filippou for their support on configuring the experimental setup.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) [AIM FSP_TB10_WP05].