1,536
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Ovarian reserve

Laparoscopic surgeries for uterine fibroids and ovarian cysts reduce ovarian reserve via age- and surgical type-manner

, , , &
Pages 1068-1072 | Received 11 Mar 2022, Accepted 17 Sep 2022, Published online: 05 Oct 2022

Abstract

Aim: Diminished ovarian reserve can be characterized by poor response to ovulation and low number of eggs. The risk factors include endometriosis, receiving cancer treatment, luteal phase deficiency and gynecologic surgery. Uterine fibroids and ovarian cysts are the most common benign gynecological diseases in women globally. This prospective study evaluated the influence of laparoscopic surgery treating benign gynecological diseases on ovarian reserve. Methods: A total of 121 patients with uterine fibroids or benign ovarian cysts who received laparoscopic surgeries (41 with hysterectomy, 36 with myomectomy, 18 with adnexectomy, and 26 with ovarian cystectomy) were included. The ovarian reserve status defined as serum anti-Mullerian hormone concentration was assessed at 1 month before and after surgery, respectively. Results: The anti-Mullerian hormone reduction level was 22.34% in cystectomy, 44.1% in adnexectomy, 24.92% in myomectomy, and 47.61% in hysterectomy (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that adnexectomy had significantly high risk of high serum anti-Mullerian hormone reduction level (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 14.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.56-86.93, p = 0.003). Conclusions: These 4 laparoscopic surgeries all reduced the AMH levels 1 month after the procedure. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up are necessary to know the real impact on the ovarian reserve. Adnexectomy was an independent factor of reduced ovarian reserve in 1 month after surgery.

摘要

目的

卵巢储备功能降低可表现为对排卵反应差和卵子数量少。危险因素包括子宫内膜异位症、接受肿瘤治疗、黄体功能不足和妇科手术。子宫肌瘤和卵巢囊肿是全球女性最常见的良性妇科疾病。此前瞻性研究评价腹腔镜手术治疗良性妇科疾病对卵巢储备功能的影响。

方法

收集121例行腹腔镜手术的子宫肌瘤或卵巢良性囊肿患者, 其中子宫切除术41例, 子宫肌瘤切除术36例, 附件切除术18例, 卵巢囊肿切除术26例。术前1个月、术后1个月评估卵巢储备功能情况, 即血清抗苗勒氏管激素浓度。

结果

抗苗勒氏激素降低水平在卵巢囊肿切除术中为22.34%, 附件切除术为44.1%, 子宫肌瘤剔除术为24.92%, 子宫切除术为47.61% (p<0.001)。多因素分析显示, 附件切除术患者血清抗苗勒氏管激素降低明显, 风险显著增加(调整优势比(aOR): 14.90, 95%置信区间(CI): 2.56 ∼ 86.93, p=0.003)。

结论

这四种腹腔镜手术术后1个月AMH水平均有降低。进一步的前瞻性研究和较长时间的随访很必要的, 以了解对卵巢储备功能的真正影响。附件切除术是术后1个月卵巢储备减少的独立因素。

Introduction

Ovarian reserve is a concept which describes the storage of woman’s oocyte and the ability of producing mature follicle for ovulation [Citation1]. Generally, ovarian reserve will diminish during ovarian aging [Citation2]. However, diminished ovarian reserve could be observed in young women with infertility [Citation3]. Diminished ovarian reserve could be characterized by two conditions: low number of eggs, and poor response to ovulation [Citation2,Citation3]. Recent knowledge reveals the risk factors of diminished ovarian reserve include endometriosis, receiving cancer treatment, luteal phase deficiency, and gynecologic surgery [Citation4–7].

Uterine fibroids and ovarian cysts are the most common benign gynecological diseases in women with prevalence of 4.5-70% and 7-21% in global, respectively [Citation8,Citation9]. Uterine fibroids are characterized by noncancerous growth in the uterus, which commonly appears during childbearing years; ovarian cysts are a fluid-filled sac or pocket that appears in the ovary or on its surface [Citation10,Citation11]. Laparoscopic surgery is the primary treatment approach for patients with these conditions, especially for symptomatic women. Laparoscopic or robotic surgery is a minimally invasive procedure with a smaller abdominal incision, shorter recovery time, and less discomfort [Citation12,Citation13]. This type of surgery may include hysterectomy, myomectomy, adnexectomy, and ovarian cystectomy. Yet, the effect of laparoscopic surgery on the ovarian reserve remains debatable. A prospective cohort study for investigating the interference of ovarian reserve by applying laparoscopy in endometriosis treatment showed a significant decrease of ovarian reserve [Citation14]. However, recovery of ovarian reserve in 9-12 months after surgery was evident in patients underwent 3-step laparoscopic surgery compared to those underwent one-step surgery [Citation15]. Therefore, knowing the effects of different operations on the ovarian reserve is vital in providing more accurate guidance for patients in selecting individual surgical methods.

Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is a dimer glycoprotein, mainly secreted by follicular granulosa cells [Citation16]. AMH inhibits recruitment of primordial follicles and reduce follicle maturation stimulated by follicular stimulating hormone [Citation17]. Therefore, AMH can keep minimal exhaustion of ovarian pool and is believed as an indicator of ovarian function [Citation18]. Thus, serum AMH concentration is one of the conventional indicators of ovarian reserve [Citation19]. Since serum AMH level changes mildly during different menstrual cycles and is independent to hormonal contraceptives and pregnancy, it can be regarded as a reliable and stable biological marker for evaluating ovarian reserve function [Citation20]. In this study, the pre- and post-operation AMH levels were measured to evaluate the effect of gynecological laparoscopic surgery on ovarian reserve.

Materials and methods

Study design

Patients with uterine fibroids or ovarian cysts who underwent laparoscopic surgery at our hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 were enrolled in the study. All cases were diagnosed by postoperative pathology. Inclusion criteria were 1) age between 18 to 50 years with regular menstrual periods (25-35 days), 2) no other endocrine diseases such as thyroid disease, hyperprolactinemia, and Cushing’s syndrome, and 3) no hormonal treatment within 3 months before surgery, neither oral contraceptives nor GnRH analogues. The primary outcome was the status of ovarian reserve, indicated by the serum AMH concentration. Relevant clinical data were collected, including age, height, weight, BMI, fertility, and menstruation.

This prospective study complied the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was reviewed and approved by Institutional Review Board of South Branch of Fujian Provincial Hospital (K2020-12-026). A signed informed consent was obtained from all included patients.

Surgical approach

All surgeries were performed by Dr. Xiao-Long Shi from South Branch of Fujian Provincial Hospital (Fujian, China) using laparoscope. Briefly, pneumoperitoneum needle was injected into the umbilical hole, after which CO2 gas was injected into the abdominal cavity (the pressure was maintained at 12 mmHg). One 1.0 cm incision was made to place puncture devices at the umbilical hole, and three 0.5-1.2 cm puncture holes were made in the left and right lower abdomen, respectively. When necessary, simple uterine lifting devices were used to help adjust the uterine direction.

Uterine fibroids

Patients with uterine fibroids underwent hysterectomy or myomectomy according to the indications and personal willingness. No ovaries were removed; no ovarian cystectomy was performed during hysterectomy and myomectomy.

Hysterectomy: hysterectomy was performed in a conventional manner. Bilateral fallopian tubes were removed. Bilateral tubes, pelvic ligaments, and ovarian ligaments were bilaterally transected, and the uterus was vaginally removed. Cutting and haemostasis were achieved with an ultrasonic scalpel and bipolar coagulation.

Myomectomy: a vasopressin solution was injected into the serosa and myometrium overlying the fibroid to decrease bleeding. Suitable myometrial incisions were performed with unipolar cautery. Fibroids were enucleated along the cleavage plane with great care to avoid the endometrial cavity and to avoid manipulation of the corner or fallopian tubes. The myometrium was closed in layers using 0 or 2–0 absorbable suture. The excised fibroids were removed with an electrical morcellator.

Ovarian cysts

Patients with ovarian cysts underwent adnexectomy or ovarian cystectomy according to the indications and personal willingness. All adnexectomies were unilateral, while ovarian cystectomy has no restrictions.

Adnexectomy: ultrasonic scalpel (ACE/HAR, Johnson, USA) and bipolar combination (RoBi38151, Karl Storz, Germany) were used to cut off the ovarian ligaments and fallopian tubes. The excised ovarian cyst was placed in the specimen bag and removed from the puncture hole.

Ovarian cystectomy: two noninvasive forceps were used to blunt exfoliate the cyst or cystic wall through traction and back-traction. Scissors were used to cut off the lesion tissue when the cyst and ovarian tissue were dense adherents, after which the oophoroplasty was performed. Bipolar electrocoagulation was occasionally applied for hemostasis.

Serum AMH test

Blood samples were collected before and at 1 month after surgery. Serum from each blood sample was isolated by centrifugation after coagulation and stored at −80 °C before use. Analysis of serum AMH level was measured by automatic electrochemical luminescence analyzer (Roche Cobas 8000, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Basel-Stadt Switzerland) coupled with specific AMH analysis kit (Elecsys® AMH, Hoffman-La Roche).

Statistical analysis

Continuous data from each treatment are firstly tested with normality by Shapiro-Wilk test followed by presented as the median (Q1, Q3) and were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test and the pairwise comparison are performed by Dunn’s test. Categorical data were analyzed with the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test and presented as n (%). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs for percentage (relative) of △AMH 30%. The multivariate logistic regression included the variable that P-value less than 0.2 in univariate logistic regression. All statistical analyses were carried out with SAS 9.4. A two-tailed P value < 0.05 is considered significant.

Results

A total of 121 patients were included in this study, including 26 patients undergoing cystectomy (group 1), 18 patients undergoing adnexectomy (group 2), 36 patients with myomectomy (group 3), and 41 patients with hysterectomy (group 4). Patient characteristics are listed in . There are significant different of age, gravidity, parity, BMI, hospital stay, histological type in OVC patients, surgery time, blood loss, and FT4 in the four groups. The hysterectomy group had highest median age (47 vs 29.5 ∼ 40.5 years, p < 0.001; difference: group 4 vs 1 ∼ 3), gravidity (3 vs 1 ∼ 1.5, p = 0.003; difference: group 4 vs 1,2), parity (2 vs 1, p = 0.003; difference: group 4 vs 1,2), BMI (24.55 vs 21.15 and 21.63 kg/m2, p < 0.001; difference: group 4 vs 1,3), longest hospital stay (10 vs 8 days, p = 0.004; difference: group 4 vs 1) and surgery time (115 vs 75, 90 min; difference: group 4 vs 1, 2) of all groups. The myomectomy group had significantly higher age, surgery time, and blood loss than cystectomy group (difference: group 3 vs 1). The two OVC groups had higher FT4 than the two UTF groups (p = 0.022). In the two OVC groups, adnexectomy group had significantly higher proportion of serous cystadenoma than cystectomy group (38.89% vs 15.38%, p = 0.031). No significant difference in subject demographics between two OVC groups.

Table 1. Characteristic of population.

shows the outcome in the 4 groups. There were significant differences in preoperative AMH level (p < 0.001), postoperative AMH level (p < 0.001), △AMH level (p = 0.001), percentage (relative) of △AMH (p < 0.001), and patient number of percentage (relative) of △AMH 30% (p = 0.001) among the four surgery groups. The hysterectomy had lowest median preoperative AMH level (0.36 vs 1.16 ∼ 2.02 ng/ml, p < 0.001; difference: group 4 vs 1 ∼ 3), postoperative AMH level (0.19 vs 0.99 ∼ 1.65 ng/ml, p < 0.001; difference: group 4 vs 1 ∼ 3), △AMH level (-0.17 vs −0.23∼-0.45 ng/ml, p = 0.001; difference: group 4 vs 1,2), and highest percentage (relative) of △AMH (47.61 vs 22.34, 24.92 ng/ml, p < 0.001; difference: group 4 vs 1, 3). The four surgery groups had significant different proportion of percentage (relative) of △AMH 30% (p = 0.001), adnexectomy group had the highest rate (72.22%), and the cystectomy group had the lowest rate (26.92%).

Table 2. Outcomes of population.

As shown as , the logistic regression showed the risk factors of percentage of △AMH level ≥30% between the four groups. Regarding to cystectomy group the univariate logistic regression showed higher risks in hysterectomy (OR: 7.40, 95% CI: 2.44-22.42, p < 0.001) and adnexectomy group (OR: 7.06, 95% CI: 1.84-27.14, p = 0.005), and older age (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.13, p = 0.001), higher gravidity (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.10-1.86, p = 0.009), and parity (OR: 1.08 95% CI: 1.14-2.90, p = 0.012) on percentage of △AMH level ≥30%. After adjusting the variable of P-value less than 0.2, multivariate logistic regression showed that higher risks still in adnexectomy group (OR: 14.9, 95% CI: 2.56-86.93, p = 0.003) but not in hysterectomy (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 0.31-11.19, p = 0.493).

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analysis on percentage of △AMH level cut at 30%.

Discussion

This is the first study to evaluate the influence on the postoperative serum AMH levels of different operations performed in benign gynecological diseases. Our results suggest that the four different laparoscopic surgeries for UTF and OVC all impaired ovarian reserve. Adnexectomy is associated with a significantly higher risk in ovarian reserve reduction more than 30%.

In the current study, serum AMH reduction level was up to 45-50% in adnexectomy and hysterectomy; univariate analysis also showed significantly high risks in these two surgeries for serum AMH reduction more than 30% after surgery. Interestingly, after adjusting for age, only adnexectomy still had significantly high risk. Adnexectomy is a conventional surgery for treating benign or malignant disease on ovary or fallopian tubes [Citation21], especially for patients without pregnancy plans. Because a removal of ovary adjacent to uterus by adnexectomy may damage the ovary reserve.

The influence of hysterectomy in ovarian reserve is contradicted. A prospective study showed that both laparoscopic and non-laparoscopic hysterectomy caused permanent serum AMH reduction [Citation22], whereas other studies showed no significant difference in ovarian reserve in 2-3 months after laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy [Citation23,Citation24]. Fluctuation of ovarian artery by hysterectomy was considered as the cause of serum AMH reduction [Citation24,Citation25]. However, Abdelazim et al. showed no significant difference in the ovary volume and ovarian-related hormone content between pre- and post-hysterectomy [Citation26]. Accordingly, the reduction of serum AMH concentration after hysterectomy might be also transient. Considering that patients received hysterectomy had higher healthy-related quality of life than those received myomectomy [Citation27], hysterectomy is more recommended than myomectomy if the patient has no plan to get pregnancy.

Our results showed no significant difference was found in AMH reduction level between cystectomy and myomectomy; myomectomy does not elevate the risk of diminished ovarian reserve compared to cystectomy. It has been reported that serum AMH level was reduced after myomectomy and recovered in 3 months [Citation28]. Laparoscopic cystectomy is believed in preserving ovarian reserve by minimal removal of normal ovarian tissue [Citation29]. Although the permeant harm of ovarian reserve after laparoscopic cystectomy has been reported, the reduced ovarian reserve could recover to 65% in 3 months after surgery [Citation30]. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that an excess removal of normal ovarian tissue my happen during cystectomy. A study showed that 6% patients who received cystectomy underwent an excessive removal of ovarian tissues [Citation31]. Although an excessive removal of ovarian tissue could effectively diminish the recurrent rate, it may also accelerate the reduction of ovarian reserve [Citation32]. The damage level in ovarian reserve by laparoscopic cystectomy depends on the surgeon’s skill [Citation33]. Therefore, improvements of surgeons’ skill and novel surgical techniques such as robotic assisted cystectomy or single-port cystectomy could effectively preserve normal ovarian tissues [Citation34,Citation35]. In addition, the influence of cystectomy on ovarian function is reported to correlate to basal AMH level and bilateral operation, not size of cyst [Citation36].

This study has some limitations. Firstly, the sample size is small. Secondly, it lacked a long-time follow-up in ovarian reserve. Studies have shown a recovery of ovarian reserve in 2 or 3 months after hysterectomy, myomectomy, or cystectomy surgery [Citation23, Citation28, Citation30]. Hence, it’s foreseeable to follow monitor serum AMH concentration in at least 3 months after surgery to evaluate the long-term effect on ovarian reserve of the four surgeries.

Conclusion

All four laparoscopic surgeries impair ovarian function in one month after surgery. Adnexectomy is an independent factor of reduced ovarian reserve in 1 month after surgery. It is necessary to make a prudent decision when selecting surgical treatment for perimenopausal women with uterine fibroids or ovarian cysts.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

Startup Fund for scientific research of Fujian Medical University (Grant number 2018QH1118); Youth Scientific Research Project of Fujian Provincial Health Department(Grant number 2021QNB004).

References

  • Ulrich ND, Marsh EE. Ovarian reserve testing: a review of the options, their applications, and their limitations. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;62(2):228–237.
  • Rasool S, Shah D. Fertility with early reduction of ovarian reserve: the last straw that breaks the Camel’s back. Fertil Res Pract. 2017;3(1):15.
  • Morin SJ, Patounakis G, Juneau CR, et al. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(8):1489–1498.
  • Pfister A, Crawford NM, Steiner AZ. Association between diminished ovarian reserve and luteal phase deficiency. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(2):378–386.
  • Shandley LM, Fothergill A, Spencer JB, et al. Impact of cancer treatment on risk of infertility and diminished ovarian reserve in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):516–525.e1.
  • Kitajima M, Khan KN, Harada A, et al. Association between ovarian endometrioma and ovarian reserve. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2018;10(1):92–102.
  • Hong SB, Lee NR, Kim SK, et al. In vitrofertilization outcomes in women with surgery induced diminished ovarian reserve after endometrioma operation: Comparison with diminished ovarian reserve without ovarian surgery. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017;60(1):63–68.
  • Farghaly SA. Current diagnosis and management of ovarian cysts. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(6):609–612.
  • Stewart EA, Cookson CL, Gandolfo RA, et al. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017;124(10):1501–1512.
  • Bednarska S, Siejka A. The pathogenesis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: What’s new? Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017;26(2):359–367.
  • Ciavattini A, Di Giuseppe J, Stortoni P, et al. Uterine fibroids: Pathogenesis and interactions with endometrium and endomyometrial junction. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:173184.
  • Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(8):CD003677.
  • Nieboer TE, Hendriks JC, Bongers MY, et al. Quality of life after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(1):85–91.
  • Goodman LR, Goldberg JM, Flyckt RL, et al. Effect of surgery on ovarian reserve in women with endometriomas, endometriosis and controls. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):589.
  • Kitajima M, Matsumoto K, Murakami N, et al. Ovarian reserve after three-step laparoscopic surgery for endometriomas utilizing dienogest: a pilot study. Reprod Med Biol. 2020;19(4):425–431.
  • Hu R, Wang FM, Yu L, et al. Antimullerian hormone regulates stem cell factor expression in human granulosa cells. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1742–1750.e1.
  • Dumont A, Robin G, Catteau-Jonard S, et al. Role of anti-Müllerian hormone in pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:137.
  • Moolhuijsen LME, Visser JA. Anti-Müllerian hormone and ovarian reserve: Update on assessing ovarian function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(11):3361–3373.
  • Tal R, Seifer DB. Ovarian reserve testing: a user’s guide. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(2):129–140.
  • Dewailly D, Andersen CY, Balen A, et al. The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Mullerian hormone in women. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):370–385.
  • Langebrekke A, Urnes A. Laparoscopic adnexectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1991;70(7–8):605–609.
  • Cho H-y, Park ST, Kyung MS, et al. Assessment of ovarian reserve after hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. non-laparoscopic surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;210:54–57.
  • Cho H-Y, Kyung MS. Comparison of postoperative ovarian reserve function following laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy: a prospective comparative pilot study. JCM. 2021;10(14):3077.
  • Lee DP, Kim BG, Bae DS, et al. Change in the ovarian environment after hysterectomy as assessed by ovarian arterial blood flow indices and serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(1):82–85.
  • Xiangying H, Lili H, Yifu S. The effect of hysterectomy on ovarian blood supply and endocrine function. Climacteric. 2006;9(4):283–289.
  • Abdelazim IA, Abdelrazak KM, Elbiaa AAM, et al. Ovarian function and ovarian blood supply following premenopausal abdominal hysterectomy. Prz Menopauzalny. 2015;14(4):238–242.
  • Wallace K, Zhang S, Thomas L, et al. Comparative effectiveness of hysterectomy versus myomectomy on one-year health-related quality of life in women with uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(3):618–626.
  • Aharon D, Sekhon L, Lee JA, et al. A longitudinal assessment of ovarian reserve after myomectomy. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(3):E83.
  • Lim H, Park SJ, Paik H, PRAHA Study Group, et al. Preservation of the ovarian reserve and hemostasis during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy by a hemostatic agent versus suturing for patients with ovarian endometriosis: study protocol for randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial (Praha-2 trial). Trials. 2021;22(1):473.
  • Chang HJ, Han SH, Lee JR, et al. Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):343–349.
  • Muzii L, Bianchi A, Crocè C, et al. Laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts: is the stripping technique a tissue-sparing procedure? Fertil Steril. 2002;77(3):609–614.
  • Roman H. Endometriosis surgery and preservation of fertility, what surgeons should know. J Visc Surg. 2018;155:S31–S36.
  • Perlman S, Kjer JJ. Ovarian damage due to cyst removal: a comparison of endometriomas and dermoid cysts. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(3):285–290.
  • Tsiampa E, Spartalis E, Tsourouflis G, et al. Impact on ovarian reserve after minimally invasive single‐port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in patients with benign ovarian cysts: a systematic review and Meta‐analysis. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(12):e14875.
  • Carter S, Depasquale S, Stallings S. Robotic-Assisted laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy during pregnancy. AJP Rep. 2011;1(1):21–424.
  • Ozaki R, Kumakiri J, Tinelli A, et al. Evaluation of factors predicting diminished ovarian reserve before and after laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometriomas: a prospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res. 2016;9(1):37.