293
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Insight level in the assimilation process: A comparison of good- and poor-outcome cases in short-term dynamic psychotherapy of depressive inpatients

, , &
Pages 134-151 | Received 08 Oct 2015, Accepted 01 Mar 2016, Published online: 18 Apr 2016
 

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the association between treatment outcome and the assimilation of problematic experiences during psychotherapy. The assimilation process is described in an eight-level sequence, the Assimilation of Problematic Experiences Scale (APES); insight is conceived as one level in this developmental sequence. This level is considered central as related to decreases in distress and symptomatic improvements. Based on treatment outcome measures, two contrasting groups were selected from a randomized controlled trial. The cases, three successful and three unsuccessful, included clients hospitalized for moderate or severe depression who received a short-term dynamic psychotherapy. Thirty-six session transcripts (six per client) were rated for assimilation level using the APES. In an exploratory purpose, linear mixed effects models were performed to compare successful and unsuccessful cases on their assimilation evolution. Results were partially consistent with the observations of previous studies linking a successful treatment outcome with insight events. Two successful cases reached the insight level, while none of the unsuccessful cases did. The quantitative analyses revealed that both groups presented a significant and similar increase in assimilation during psychotherapy. This study raised different issues concerning the association between assimilation, insight events, and treatment outcome.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Michèle Grossen, Antonio Pascual-Leone, Bill Stiles, and Mehdi Mohammad Gholamrezaee for their support and helpful advice.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation [grant number FNS 32003B-135098].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.