Entry and Innovation in Maturing Markets: Virtual Operators in Mobile Telecommunications

Abstract

In the last few years the mobile telecommunications industry has witnessed the entry of a large number of new service providers. Traditionally, mobile users get their mobile services from the service providers owned by vertically integrated mobile network operators (MNOs). The new entrants do not own a network of their own however, because they use the existing mobile infrastructure, i.e. they are ‘mobile virtual network operators’ (MVNOs). By granting these virtual operators access to their networks, MNOs actually facilitate the entry of potential competitors for their own downstream service providers. These new entrants might attract additional users by offering competitive services and create extra value with their well-known brand names and other complementary assets. This study focuses on the mobile market of the Netherlands, where competition is intense and MVNOs proliferate. The aim of this research is to improve our understanding of the entry of virtual operators in general, and specifically by explaining why and how virtual operators enter the mobile market and the impact they have on competition in the mobile market.

Notes

1. Telecompaper (2005) Dutch MVNOs have 14 percent market share, www.telecompaper.com, 15 December 2005.

2. K. M. Eisenhardt, Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 1989, pp. 532–550; R. K. Yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods, 3rd edn (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003).

3. F. Jaspers, W. Hulsink & J. Theeuwes, Reguleren? Reguleren!; Nieuwkomers zonder netwerk in de mobiele telecomsector (Regulate? Regulate! New entrants without a network in mobile communications), I&I: Nieuwe Media in Perspectief, 6, 2004, pp. 34–41; F. Jaspers & W. Hulsink, Op zoek naar relevantie in de mobiele markt (Searching for market relevance in the Dutch mobile telecoms market), Economisch Statistische Berichten, 90(4468), 2005, pp. 348–349; W. Hulsink & F. Jaspers, Na KPN nu NMA en OPTA aan zet (After KPN's move to acquire Telfort, it is now up to the regulators), Het Financieele Dagblad, 19 July 2005, p. 5; SEO, Toegang tot mobiele netwerken; onderzoek in opdracht van OPTA (Access to mobile networks: research project for the Dutch regulator Opta), Amsterdam (Project for the Dutch regulator Opta, 2001).

4. Planet Multimedia, Debitel wint in zakelijk mobiel (Debitel wins in mobile business communications), www.planet.nl/multimedia, 5 February 2004.

5. M. C. W. Janssen, A. P. Ros & N. Van der Windt (Eds), De draad kwijt? Onderzoek naar de gang van zaken rond de Nederlandse UMTS-veiling (Wires crossed: research into the organisation of the Dutch UMTS auction), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam (Project for the Dutch Parliament, 2001).

6. Opta, AMM evaluatie mobiele telefonie 2002 (Significant Market Power evaluation mobile telephony 2002). Den Haag, 2002.

7. NMa, NMa beboet operators mobiele telefonie voor EUR 88 miljoen (NMA fines operators mobile telephony for EUR 88 million), Press Release, 30 December 2002, Den Haag.

8. Opta, op. cit., Ref. 6; and Opta, Vormen van bijzondere toegang tot mobiele netwerken en redelijkheid van verzoeken hiertoe (Forms of special access to mobile networks and reasonableness of access requests), Den Haag, 2001.

9. E. Romanelli, New venture strategies in the minicomputer industry, California Management Review, 30(1), 1987, pp. 160–175.

10. Oftel, Mobile virtual network operators: Oftel inquiry into what MVNOs could offer consumers, Oftel, 1999.

11. SEO, op. cit., Ref. 3.

12. Planet Multimedia, op. cit., Ref. 4.

13. Pyramid Research, MVNO hosting: Telfort shows the potential of wholesale business, Pyramid Research, 2005, www.pyramidresearch.com (accessed in January 2006).

14. Ibid.

15. Telecom.paper, op. cit., Ref. 1.

16. Opta, Zienswijze overname Telfort (openbaar) [Position acquisition Telfort (public)]. The Hague, 2005.

17. SEO, op. cit., Ref. 3.

18. EIM, Marktonderzoek AMM 2001: de markt van mobiele telefonie (Market research Significant Market Power 2001: the mobile telephony market), Zoetermeer, 2001.

19. F.P.H. Jaspers, Mobile virtual network operator: Klaploper of Redder in Nood? Toetreding en Innovatie in een Gereguleerde Netwerkindustrie (Mobile virtual network operator: spongers or Lifesavers? Access and innovation in a regulated network industry), Unpublished MSc. Thesis, RSM Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 2002; Ø. Foros & B. Hansen, Connecting customers and disconnecting competitors: the facility-based firms' strategy towards virtual operators, Journal of Network Industries, 2(2), 2001, pp. 207–230.

20. SEO, op. cit., Ref. 3.

21. Communications International, Case study: making sense, Communications International, 1 May 2001; Communications Week International, Scandinavia: virtual operators—new business opportunities for MVNOs, Communications Week International, 9 October 2000.

22. Jaspers & Hulsink, op. cit., Ref. 3.

23. SEO, op. cit., Ref. 3.

24. NMa, Besluit van de directeur-generaal van de Nederlandse mededingingsautoriteit tot afwijzing van een aanvraag tot het nemen van een besluit op grond van artikel 56, eerste lid, van de Mededingingswet, Zaaknummer 1657 Talkline vs KPN (Decision of the Director-General of the Dutch Competition Authority to reject a request by virtue of Article 56.1 of the Competition Act-Case 1657 Talkline versus KPN), Den Haag, 2001.

25. O. E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: The Free Press, 1985); D. J. Teece, Profiting from technological innovation. Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Research Policy, 15(6), 1986, pp. 285–305.

26. R. Gulati & H. Singh, The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 1998, pp. 781–814.

27. R. Gulati, P. R. Lawrence & P. Puranam, Adaptation in vertical relationships: beyond incentive conflict, Strategic Management Journal, 26, 2005, pp. 415–440.

28. In 2004, while preparing for Virgin Mobile's initial public offering (allowing T-Mobile to sell off its stock), the two companies drafted a new network supply agreement in which T-Mobile was locked in as the sole carrier of Virgin Mobile's voice calls for several years. Hence, both firms currently transact in a buyer–supplier relationship.

29. S. Ulset, Mobile virtual network operators: a strategic transaction cost analysis of preliminary experiences, Telecommunications Policy, 26, 2002, pp. 537–549.

30. Romanelli, op. cit., Ref. 3.

31. H. W. De Jong, Dynamische markttheorie (Dynamic market theory) (Leiden: Stenfert Kroese, 1989); C. W. Hill & G. R. Jones, Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1995); M. E. Porter, Competitive Strategy. Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (New York: Free Press, 1980).

32. C. M. Christensen, The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997).

33. R. M. Henderson & K. B. Clark, Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1990, pp. 9–30.

34. C. F. Maitland, J. M. Bauer & R. Westerveld, The European market for mobile data: evolving value chains and industry structures, Telecommunications Policy, 26, 2002, pp. 485–504; J. Anderson & B. Williams, Unbundling the mobile value chain, Business Strategy Review, 15(3), 2004, pp. 51–57.

35. M. L. Tushman & D. A. Nadler, Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design, Academy of Management Review, 3, 1978, pp. 613–624.

36. Williamson, op. cit., Ref. 24.

37. M. L. Tushman & P. Anderson, Technological discontinuities and organizational environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 1986, pp. 439–465.

38. G. Dosi, Technological paradigms and technological trajectories; a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11, 1982, pp. 147–162.

39. H. W. Chesbrough & D. Teece, When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation, Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 1996, pp. 65–74.