Female employment growth in Britain, 1979–92: some competing hypotheses^∗

^∗ I am grateful for comments on this paper from participants at the Malvern Political Economy Conference in August 1992.

Abstract

Over the period 1979–92, the gender and status composition of employment has undergone significant change in Britain, which cannot be attributed merely to cyclical influences. In this paper changes in the pattern of employment by occupation, gender and part-time and full-time status are decomposed to cast some light on three hypotheses (buffer stock, substitution and segregation) which are designed to explain the growth of female employment in Britain over the period 1979–92. The results reveal that women have made some progress in achieving full-time employment positions, after correction for the influence of structural change and the declining full-time share of employment. It is noted, however, that following the labour market legislation of the 1980s full-time employment is not necessarily more secure than part-time. The long run substitution of part-time for full-time employment has benefited the employment of women, even though their share of part-time employment has declined. The analysis informs the debate on the flexible firm at least in respect of numerical flexibility.

^∗ I am grateful for comments on this paper from participants at the Malvern Political Economy Conference in August 1992.

^∗ I am grateful for comments on this paper from participants at the Malvern Political Economy Conference in August 1992.

Notes

^∗ I am grateful for comments on this paper from participants at the Malvern Political Economy Conference in August 1992.