157
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
AIDSIMPACT SPECIAL ISSUE 2010

What happened to multiple sexual partnerships in Swaziland? Analysis of five linked national surveys between 2002 and 2008

, , , &
Pages 955-960 | Received 15 Sep 2009, Published online: 07 Jun 2010
 

Abstract

Multiple sexual partnerships are a driver of the HIV epidemic in southern Africa. Five linked cluster surveys in 2002, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 allowed us to measure changes in rates of multiple partnerships in these clusters in Swaziland. We selected a stratified random sample of census enumeration areas in 2002 and survey teams subsequently revisited this same sample (a random sub-sample in 2005 and 2006). For this study, analysis includes only people aged 18–29 years interviewed in communities included in all five surveys (1862 men and 2701 women).

Among men, there was a significant fall in the proportion having multiple partners in the last 12 months (MP12), among those that had any, between 2002 (61%) and 2007 (46%), followed by a slight rise in 2008 (49%). For multiple partnerships in the last six months (MP6 – measured in 2005 and 2006), there was a decrease between 2005 (43%) and 2006 (25%). There was a significant decrease in multiple partnerships in the last month (MP1) between 2005 (35%) and 2006 (16%), followed by an increase in 2007 (24%) and 2008 (25%). Among women, there was a significant decrease in MP12 between 2002 (22%) and 2007 (9%), then a significant increase in 2008 (15%). There was little difference in women's MP6 between 2005 (7%) and 2006 (6%). There was also little change in women's MP1 between 2005 (5%) and 2006 (3%), with an increase from 2007 (3%) to 2008 (6%); the 2006–2008 difference was significant.

A 2006 campaign to reduce multiple partnerships may have changed behaviour among men or it may have made them less likely to admit to multiple partners. The recent increase in MP12 and MP1, especially among women, may reflect behaviour or it could reflect increased willingness to report.

Acknowledgements

Some of the findings reported here emanate from further analysis of the “Soul City regional programme audience reception and impact evaluation”, for which CIET was commissioned to undertake surveys in eight countries in 2002 and 2007. CIET was funded by USAID to carry out the surveys in 2005 and 2006, through the Tulane University REACH programme. The survey in 2008 was part of a CIET project in Botswana, Namibia and Swaziland, funded by the Canadian International Development Research Centre. We thank CIET colleagues who supported data collection in the Swaziland surveys: Manuel Pascual Salcedo, Serge Merhi, Thamie Mokoena, Ncumisa Ngxowa, John Lengwe Kunda and Deborah Milne.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.