4,640
Views
59
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Achieving equity in HIV-treatment outcomes: can social protection improve adolescent ART-adherence in South Africa?

, , , , , & show all
Pages 73-82 | Received 15 Mar 2016, Accepted 23 Mar 2016, Published online: 08 Jul 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Low ART-adherence amongst adolescents is associated with morbidity, mortality and onward HIV transmission. Reviews find no effective adolescent adherence-promoting interventions. Social protection has demonstrated benefits for adolescents, and could potentially improve ART-adherence. This study examines associations of 10 social protection provisions with adherence in a large community-based sample of HIV-positive adolescents. All 10–19-year-olds ever ART-initiated in 53 government healthcare facilities in a health district of South Africa’s Eastern Cape were traced and interviewed in 2014–2015 (n = 1175 eligible). About 90% of the eligible sample was included (n = 1059). Social protection provisions were “cash/cash in kind”: government cash transfers, food security, school fees/materials, school feeding, clothing; and “care”: HIV support group, sports groups, choir/art groups, positive parenting and parental supervision/monitoring. Analyses used multivariate regression, interaction and marginal effects models in SPSS and STATA, controlling for socio-demographic, HIV and healthcare-related covariates. Findings showed 36% self-reported past-week ART non-adherence (<95%). Non-adherence was associated with increased opportunistic infections (p = .005, B .269, SD .09), and increased likelihood of detectable viral load at last test (>75 copies/ml) (aOR 1.98, CI 1.1–3.45). Independent of covariates, three social protection provisions were associated with reduced non-adherence: food provision (aOR .57, CI .42–.76, p < .001); HIV support group attendance (aOR .60, CI .40–.91, p < .02), and high parental/caregiver supervision (aOR .56, CI .43–.73, p < .001). Combination social protection showed additive benefits. With no social protection, non-adherence was 54%, with any one protection 39–41%, with any two social protections, 27–28% and with all three social protections, 18%. These results demonstrate that social protection provisions, particularly combinations of “cash plus care”, may improve adolescent adherence. Through this they have potential to improve survival and wellbeing, to prevent HIV transmission, and to advance treatment equity for HIV-positive adolescents.

Acknowledgements

We thank Tom Fenn, Patricia Lim Ah Ken, Susan Kasedde, Chewe Luo and Chiho Suzuki (UNICEF), David Chipanta (UNAIDS) Rajen Govender (SA MRC and UCT) Stuart Kean (WorldVision), John Miller (Coalition for Children Affected by AIDS), Jason Wolfe (USAID), and Mpumi Zungu (HSRC) for discussion and input. We thank Marija Pantelic for additional analyses. We thank research teams and all participants and their families.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by the Nuffield Foundation [CPF/41513], the John Fell Fund, CIPHER (155-Hod), Janssen Educational Grant Programme, and Evidence for HIV Prevention in Southern Africa [MM/EHPSA/UCT/05150014]. Analyses and writing were supported by UNICEF. Support was provided to LC by European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program [FP7/2007-2013]/ERC grant agreement n° 313421 and the Philip Leverhulme Trust [PLP-2014-095].