Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and HIV: are we appropriately screening?

ABSTRACT

Individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) represent a population that is at a higher risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, we sought to determine the effects of smoking on respiratory symptoms and diseases among HIV-positive patients and to determine if symptomatic patients are being appropriately screened for COPD. HIV-positive individuals completed a self-administered questionnaire. The effects of smoking on respiratory symptoms and diseases were reported as odds ratios (ORs). The COPD screening criteria were adapted from the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) guidelines. Two hundred and forty-seven participants were recruited. The median age was 49 years; 75% were male and 92% were on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Smokers represented 66% of the population. Smoking had a statistically significant effect on respiratory symptoms including wheeze (OR 4.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6–14.2]), phlegm production (OR 4.9 [95% CI: 2.2–10.5]), cough (OR 7.0 [95% CI: 3.0–16.2]), and dyspnea (OR 7.2 [95% CI: 1.7–31.2]). Smoking had a higher odds of respiratory diseases including COPD (OR 4.9 [95% CI: 1.1–21.9]) and bronchitis (OR 3.8 [95% CI: 1.9–7.7]). Among HIV-positive smokers, 40% met the CTS screening criteria, while only 12% self-reported a diagnosis of COPD. The burden of smoking in the HIV population is significant. HIV-positive smokers are more likely to report both respiratory symptoms and diseases than HIV-positive non-smokers. A discrepancy exists between patients who met the CTS screening criteria and those who were diagnosed with COPD, raising the concern for under-recognition and under-diagnosis of COPD in this population.

KEYWORDS:

• HIV
• smoking
• COPD
• screening

Acknowledgements

We thank Laura Puri for her help in the enrollment of patients and dissemination of the questionnaires as well as Sukhpreet Klaire for his help with the data entry and initial data analysis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.