Publication Cover
AIDS Care
Psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV
Volume 32, 2020 - Issue 9
333
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does internalized racism matter in HIV risk? Correlates of biomedical HIV prevention interventions among Black men who have sex with men in the United States

ORCID Icon
Pages 1116-1124 | Received 28 Oct 2019, Accepted 31 Mar 2020, Published online: 11 Apr 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Black men who have sex with men (MSM) account for 26% of all new HIV infections in the United States. Biomedical HIV interventions have proven to reduce HIV infections however the use of these interventions by Black MSM is inconsistent. Research suggests that internalized racism may contribute to inconsistent biomedical HIV interventions (condom use and PrEP use) among Black MSM. Using a national sample of 432 Black MSM, we examined the relationship between condom and PrEP use and internalized racism. The results suggest there is some evidence for an association between internalized racism and PrEP use. In addition, internalized racism was not associated with condom use for both insertive and receptive anal sex among Black MSM. These finding suggest the relationship between internalized racism and HIV prevention strategies is not facile and more attention is needed to understand the true impact of racism, both internal and societal, on HIV prevention strategies among Black MSM. These findings underscore the nature of racism in the daily lives of Black MSM and how it impacts HIV prevention strategies adopted by these men.

Acknowledgements

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the University of Denver, the University of Pittsburgh, or Emory University. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Boards at the University of Denver: IRB: 658669-2 and University of Pittsburgh: IRB: 16110238 and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. This work was partially supported by a Public Good Grant from the University of Denver and the Center for AIDS Research at Emory University (P30AI050409).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Research reported in this manuscript was funded by the University of Denver Center for Community Engagement and Service Learning (Public Good Grant).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.