nPEP protocol implementation and evaluation at a local US Crisis Center

ABSTRACT

Non-occupational Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV (nPEP) is recommended by the CDC for isolated exposures that pose “substantial risk” for HIV transmission. To combat multiple barriers to nPEP utilization, a comprehensive program was developed through the local community sexual assault provider. The purpose of this study was to evaluate nPEP protocol implementation. A retrospective chart review was conducted of all sexual assault victims seen during a six-month period, and all patients who accepted nPEP were selected for follow-up phone interviews. 157 patients presented during the study period. Mean time to care was 32.4hrs, with 126/157 (80%) presenting ≤72hrs. 114/157 (73%) patients were offered nPEP by providers. 67/114 (59%) patients accepted, with the most common reason for declining being needing more time to decide. 10/13 (77%) patients able to be contacted reported completing nPEP, with side-effects cited as the most common noncompletion reason. 9 reported side effects and 4 received recommended follow-up HIV testing. 83/99 (84%) patients clearly eligible by chart review were offered nPEP, suggesting good adherence to CDC guidelines. Most patients contacted completed nPEP despite side-effects, suggesting good adherence. Our findings demonstrated multiple points status post-sexual assault to potentially improve the nPEP process.

KEYWORDS:

• NPEP
• sexual assault
• HIV
• follow-up care
• non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Dr. Straub’s guidance in project implementation and manuscript completion. Thank you to Sandy Steblin and Jennifer Thayer for partnering with us to implement the project. We appreciate the help with data analysis from Dr. Chen and Dr. Mhaskar.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).