ABSTRACT
This cohort study evaluated non-adherence to antiretrovirals at referral services in Pernambuco, Brazil, 2016/2017, through self-report. A generalized mixed-effects model for binary outcomewas used. We assessed 542 participants with an adherence rate of 85.50%. A greater chance of non-adherence was associated with:a low/moderate level of nicotine dependence (OR = 2.79, p = 0.00, IC = 1.44-5.41); ≥7 tablets/day (OR = 6.14, p = 0.00, IC = 3.42-11.02); LPV/r (OR = 1.49, p = 0.6, IC = 0.98-2.26), ddI (OR = 3.34, p = 0.03, IC = 1.12-9.97), ABC (OR = 4.02, p = 0.05, IC = 1.01-16.03), RAL (OR = 2.49, p = 0.01, IC = 1.32-4.70) and DTG (OR = 4.65, p = 0.01, IC = 1.42-15.16); 6–10 year seropositive diagnosis (OR = 2.17, p = 0.01, IC = 1.20-3.92) and symptoms of depression (OR = 1.55, p = 0.03, IC = 1.03-2.33). Protective factors for non-adherence weres: ≥50 years (OR = 0.67, p = 0.06, IC = 0.45-1.01), secondary/higher education (OR = 0.48, p = 0.00, IC = 0.34-0.70), embarrassment at health service (OR = 0.49, p = 0.04, IC = 0.24-0.97), good understanding of antiretrovirals (OR = 0.62, p = 0.03, IC = 0.40-0.96), adverse event (OR = 0.74, p = 0,06, IC = 0.54-1.01), use of TDF (OR = 0.62, p = 0.01, IC = 0.43-0.90), NVP (OR = 0.41, p = 0.05, IC = 0.71-1.00) and EFZ (OR = 0.48, p = 0.01, IC = 0.29-0.80) and good knowledge of HIV/AIDS/ART. (OR = 0.67, p = 0.07, IC = 0.43-1.04). Variables with stronger association were those linked to ART. Systematic use of self-report adherence is recommended for priority groups.
RESUMEN
Esta cohorte evaluó la no adherencia a los antirretrovirales en los servicios de referencia en Pernambuco, Brasil, 2016/2017, a través del autoinforme. Se utilizó un modelo generalizado de efectos mixtos para la respuesta dicotómica. Se evaluaron 542 participantes y se observó una tasa de adherencia del 85.50%. Tenían más oportunidad de no adherirse los participantes con un nivel bajo/medio de dependencia a la nicotina (OR = 2.79, p = 0.00, IC = 1.44-5.41); que estuviera tomando ≥ 7 tabletas/día (OR = 6.14, p = 0.00, IC = 3.42-11.02); que estuviera usando LPV/r (OR = 1.49, p = 0.6, IC = 0.98-2.26), ddI (OR = 3.34, p = 0.03, IC = 1.12-9.97), ABC (OR = 4.02, p = 0.05, IC = 1.01-16.03), RAL (OR = 2.49, p = 0.01, IC = 1.32-4.70) y DTG (OR = 4.65, p = 0.01, IC = 1.42-15.16); con diagnóstico de seropositividad 6-10 años (OR = 2.17, p = 0.01, IC = 1.20-3.92) y con síntomas de depresión (OR = 1.55, p = 0.03, IC = 1.03-2.33). Identificado como factor de protección para: tener 50 años o más (OR = 0.67, p = 0.06, IC = 0.45-1.01), haber cursado escuela secundaria/universidad (OR = 0.48, p = 0.00, IC = 0.34-0.70), vergüenza en el centro de salud (OR = 0.49, p = 0.04, IC = 0.24-0.97), buena comprensión de los antirretrovirales (OR = 0.62, p = 0.03, IC = 0.40-0.96), evento adverso(OR = 0.74, p = 0,06, IC = 0.54-1.01), TDF (OR = 0.62, p = 0.01, IC = 0.43-0.90), NVP (OR = 0.41, p = 0.05, IC = 0.71-1.00) y EFZ (OR = 0.48, p = 0.01, IC = 0.29-0.80) y buen conocimiento del VIH/SIDA/ART. (OR = 0.67, p = 0.07, IC = 0.43-1.04).Las variables con la mayor fuerza de asociación fueron las vinculadas a ART. Se recomienda el uso sistemático del autoinforme de adhesión para grupos prioritarios.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all participants in the cohort and the staff of the Hospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Outpatient Clinic, the records department and pharmacy, and the Hospital Correia Picanço.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Ethical considerations
This research was approved by the Ethics Committee on May 27, 2015, with C.A.A.E. no. 42923514.4.0000.5192.