511
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Engaging feminist pedagogies to support equality bargaining in academia

ORCID Icon
Pages 313-328 | Received 27 Jun 2019, Accepted 28 Feb 2021, Published online: 08 Apr 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Despite decades of Equal Opportunity legislation, gender inequality persists in Australian universities. This is largely due to the shaping of universities by new market principles, discourses of individualisation that render the asymmetry of gender relations invisible, and privileging masculine epistemologies. Concurrently, industrial relations have been decentralised, and individual universities negotiate staff pay and working conditions through local Enterprise Bargaining (EB). Whilst EB mitigates the development of a national gender-equity framework for universities, trade unions operating through inequality regimes rarely prioritised gender equity even when they did lead national negotiations. Therefore, within a context of complex inequalities in higher education and trade unions, this paper explores how feminist pedagogies can facilitate equality bargaining and gender equality in academia. It also suggests that equality bargaining is especially important during (current) times of austerity when the removal of gender-equality support structures within trade unions generally occur.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Gail Crimmins

Gail Crimmins, the Deputy Head (Learning and Teaching) School of Business and Creative Industries at USC, contributes to research and discourses around gender and in the academy and inclusion and diversity in higher education. Among her recent books are: Theatricalising Narrative Research on Women Casual Academics (Springer, 2018), Strategies for Resisting Sexism in the Academy: Higher Education, Gender and Intersectionality (Springer, 2019), and Strategies for Supporting Inclusion and Diversity in Higher Education: Higher Education, Aspiration and Inequality (Springer, 2020).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.