For fraud, look under ‘serious and organized crime’

ABSTRACT

The UK government’s response to fraud cannot be disentangled from its broader ‘serious and organized crime’ (SOC) strategy. In order to explore whether fraud should—in public policy, criminal justice and law enforcement terms—be seen primarily as an SOC issue, there is a need to consider questions about whether or not ‘SOC’ is a sensible object of policy-making in the first place. Several arguments in favour of an SOC policy are identified in the paper. However, the notion of an overarching SOC policy is problematic for three reasons. First, SOC is a fundamental misrepresentation of reality, which does not correspond to a real social problem. Second, SOC policy can limit the development of more problem-specific crime strategies, Third, the ‘SOC’ label can negatively transform how social problems are perceived over the long term. If fraud is to be better understood and dealt with, it may therefore be necessary to extract it from its current inclusion within wider SOC strategy.

IMPACT

This paper argues that fraud has been subsumed by ‘serious and organized crime’ policy. It explores both the benefits and problems of this state of affairs and questions the validity of ‘serious and organized crime’ as an object of policy-making. It is hoped the paper will encourage policy-makers and practitioners to think carefully about how fraud is conceptualized as a problem.

KEYWORDS:

• Fraud
• government policy
• organized crime
• policing

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).