595
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Biologics recommendations for patients with psoriasis: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for psoriasis

, , , , , & show all
Pages 2038-2050 | Received 25 Jan 2021, Accepted 02 Apr 2021, Published online: 13 Feb 2022
 

Abstract

Purpose

This review article serves to assess the consistency of recommendations from guidelines on biologic agents for psoriasis, based on the quality evaluation of psoriasis Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search to identify CPGs that provide recommendations on diagnosis and treatment for psoriasis. Four reviewers performed a quality assessment of the included CPGs with the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument.

Results

A total of 51 sets of CPGs from 22 medical societies or separate working groups fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall quality of the eligible sets of guidelines was moderate to high, with an overall average score of 55%. The highest domain scores were Score and Purpose (70%) and Clarity of Presentation (68%). A total of 95 biologic agent recommendations were extracted from the 18 recommended CPGs. Three biologic agents (Etanercept, Adalimumab, Ustekinumab) were recommended for pediatric patients. Three biologic agents (Adalimumab, Ustekinumab, Secukinumab) were recommended as first-line biologic agents for adults with psoriasis.

Conclusion

The overall methodological quality of CPGs for psoriasis is medium to high. More attention should be paid to applicability in guideline development. The recommendations and the basis for them among various sets guidelines were almost consistent.

Disclosure statement

All authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Special Program on Guangdong Science and Technology Project [No. 2014A020221069] and the Specific Research Fund for TCM Science and Technology of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine [No. YN2015BZ09/No.YN2020QN17].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.