806
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
European Union Policy on Labor Migration

Framing the matter differently: the political dynamics of European Union labour migration policymaking

Pages 554-570 | Received 09 Dec 2013, Accepted 20 Aug 2014, Published online: 16 Apr 2015
 

Abstract

Most of the scholarly literature on European Union immigration policymaking has emphasized the predominance of governmental actors. The major changes entailed in the 2009 Lisbon Treaty, however, imply a significant increase in supranationalism and necessitate rethinking earlier conclusions. Exploring the concomitant rise of policy entrepreneurship traits in the actions taken by the European Commission, this article emphasizes the role of discourse structuration in managing policymaking in a contested and controversial policy domain. The Commission is thus gaining more influence and importance, partially facilitated by institutional changes in the Lisbon Treaty, but mainly due to astute policy entrepreneurship in facilitating consensus. Framing problems in a fashion that maximizes potential agreement by member state governments facilitates political agreement regarding potentially divisive policy proposals. Discursive elements are created and circulated that are designed to appeal, render political implementation at the national level unproblematic and, in some cases, are deliberately bipartisan in nature. Thus, great rhetorical emphasis is placed on linking policy with competitiveness, economic growth and the Europe 2020 agenda to appeal to centre-right concerns, but in the case of temporary migration links are also constructed to centre-left issues, including enhancing migrant rights, avoiding exploitation and creating benefits for sending countries. Empirically, the article focuses on the politics surrounding the genesis of the directive on highly qualified migrant workers (the so-called Blue Card) and the migrant seasonal workers directive.

Notes

1 ‘Venue shopping’ (Guiraudon Citation2000) entails the claim that governmental actors choose (or ‘shop for’) the decision-making venue most amenable to their preferences; for many years this was the European rather than the national level.

2 A useful timeline of the elaboration of this directive can be found at < http://ec.europa.eu/prelex/detail_dossier_print.cfm?CL=en&DosID=196320>.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Georg Menz

Georg Menz is Professor in Political Economy and Jean Monnet Chair in European Integration at Goldsmiths, University of London. Professor Menz has recently been a visiting fellow at Nuffield College, Oxford University and Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies in Cologne. His doctoral dissertation (University of Pittsburgh) won the Best Dissertation Award from the European Union Studies Association in 2003. In 2006, he was awarded the Best Book Award from the University Association for Contemporary European Studies for his monograph on Varieties of capitalism and europeanization: national response strategies to the single European market (Oxford University Press).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.