The process of selecting biological control agents for further development frequently does not involve conducting bioassays of strain effectiveness on a range of pathogen isolates or host cultivars. Additionally, though previous studies have demonstrated that the medium used to produce biomass of an antagonist can alter its efficacy, this factor is also rarely considered when selecting for the most effective antagonist. Host cultivar, pathogen isolate, and the cultivation medium used to produce the antagonists' biomass were examined as factors of potential importance for assessing the relative effectiveness of bacterial biocontrol strains accurately. Five bacterial antagonists that control Fusarium dry rot on stored potato tubers were assayed for effectiveness against 10 isolates of Gibberella pulicaris . All antagonists reduced disease severity (35-81%) regardless of the specific assays conducted. However, when the antagonists' biomass were produced on two media that differed both in nutrient composition and phase, the efficacy ranking of antagonist Enterobacter sp. S11:P:08 varied from first to fourth most effective. For the antagonists studied, the phase of a nutritionally identical medium had little impact on the efficacy ranking of the five antagonists. Four of the five antagonists had efficacy rankings that ranged from first to last depending on the isolate of the pathogen used to conduct the bioassay. The cultivar of the host also caused variations in the efficacy ranking of the antagonists. These results indicate that bioassays should be conducted using a range of liquid culture production media, pathogen isolates, and host cultivars in order to choose an antagonist that has the highest likelihood for commercial development as an effective biological control product.
Biocontrol Science and Technology
Volume 10, 2000 - Issue 3
![Sample our Environment & Agriculture journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5934/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Agriculture.jpg"})