418
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Potential for biocontrol of house flies, Musca domestica, using fungal biopesticides

, , &
Pages 513-524 | Received 05 Oct 2014, Accepted 19 Nov 2014, Published online: 02 Dec 2014
 

Abstract

Chemical control of house flies in poultry production facilities is becoming increasingly difficult due to insecticide resistance and regulatory constraints. Biopesticides based on entomopathogenic fungi could provide an alternative approach. Here we evaluated population control potential of two fungal pathogens, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae. Cohorts of adult flies were established in large plastic boxes in the laboratory and were exposed to residues of oil-formulated fungal conidia sprayed on strips of plastic sheeting attached to the box walls. Exposure to the biopesticide barrier treatments caused 100% mortality in adult populations within 8–16 days, depending on the fungal species. In contrast, control flies survived until 96–110 days. Additionally, fungal infections caused 13–20% reduction in egg viability and >70% reduction in fecundity of flies prior to death. The combined lethal and pre-lethal impacts resulted in 21- to 26-fold reduction in basic reproductive rate in the fungus-exposed populations relative to controls. Based on these promising proof-of-principle results, further research is currently under way to determine the feasibility of developing a biopesticide product for operational use.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Schwardt Lab, Department of Entomology, Cornell University for providing fly pupae and Dr Robert D. Anderson for suggestions on rearing flies. We are grateful for the diligent assistance of Rebecca A. Seliga, who conducted the egg viability evaluations and assisted with colony maintenance. The authors also thank Dr Simon Blanford for advice on statistical analysis and editorial suggestions to an initial draft of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The study is supported by US Agency for International Development (USAID cooperative agent No: EPP-A-00-0400016-00) and in part by Animal Health and Diagnostic Commission (AHDC), Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.