168
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Are Metarhizium brunneum conidia transferred between male and female Agriotes obscurus adults?

, &
Pages 1035-1049 | Received 27 Aug 2021, Accepted 28 May 2022, Published online: 13 Jun 2022
 

ABSTRACT

The success of autodissemination of entomopathogenic fungi depends to some degree on the transmission of infective conidia or spores from contaminated hosts to conspecifics. In the present study, we examined the potential for direct transmission of a lethal dose of Metarhizium brunneum (Petch) conidia between opposite sex pairs of Agriotes obscurus L in the laboratory. Male and female beetles were exposed to M. brunneum conidia prior to pairing with an uncontaminated opposite sex partner (‘indirectly exposed’ to M. brunnneum), 2, 21 and 45 h after M. brunneum exposure. Ninety-six percent of the female beetles that had been exposed to M. brunneum granules died by day 15, as compared to 59% and 53% of the indirectly exposed and control females. From 15 days after the beginning of the experiment, females indirectly exposed to M. brunneum had higher odds of dying at any point in time than unexposed females across all post-exposure time periods. There was no significant difference in the odds of dying between indirectly exposed males and their unexposed counterparts at any point during the experiment. When the female beetle was exposed to M. brunneum forty-five hours prior to pairing, the pairs engaged in fewer courtship interactions relative to the other treatment groups, however less than 50% of all the pairs engaged in courtship interactions. The low incidence of courtship interactions and limited transfer of conidia between A. obscurus beetle pairs suggests that negligible horizontal transmission of M. brunneum conidia may occur between conspecifics.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Beth McCannel, Sarah Zurowski, and Jessica Barclay for technical assistance. We would like to thank Dr. Jenny Cory and members of the Cory lab for feedback on the results and analyses, and three anonymous reviewers for their comments. Funding for this project was provided by the University of the Fraser Valley work-study programme.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the University of the Fraser Valley [Work-Study Grant].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.