381
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What mix of brigade combat teams should the US Army Field?

Pages 538-549 | Received 29 Jan 2015, Accepted 13 Nov 2015, Published online: 25 Apr 2016
 

Abstract

During the past decade of war, the US Army has employed its forces in roles they were not intended to fulfill. The Army could have been better prepared if it had fielded a better mixture of forces. Instead of focusing on specific threats that narrowly specify which conflicts the Army will best be prepared for, the Army should maintain a broad range of capabilities that can meet a variety of circumstances. Accordingly, the Army should seek a force structure that exhibits a 3:1:1 ratio of Infantry, Armor, and Stryker brigade combat teams (BCTs) based on the possible range of conditions that US forces could face.

Notes

1. US Army, Citation2010 Army Posture Statement, 13.

2. General Accounting Office, ‘Realistic Deployment Timelines’, 2.

3. Garamone, ‘Missions Grow as Money Declines’.

4. Lopez, ‘Brigade Combat Teams Cut’.

5. Murdock et al., Building the 2021 Affordable Military, 5–22.

6. Otterman, ‘Iraq’s Prewar Military Capabilities’.

7. Freier and Guy, ‘What Next for Army Force Structure?’.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.