298
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Household slow sand filter efficiency with schmutzdecke evaluation by microsensors

, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 4042-4053 | Received 02 Mar 2021, Accepted 31 May 2021, Published online: 15 Jun 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Slow sand filtration is a common technology providing potable water in rural households across Latin America, Asia and Africa. Two PVC household slow sand filters (HSSF) were operated in continuous (C-HSSF) and intermittent (I-HSSF) flow modes for eight consecutive months. A non-woven blanket was installed on the fine sand top to facilitate cleaning with scheduled maintenance undertaken every 30 days. The efficiency of each HSSF was evaluated via physico-chemical indicators (reduction of turbidity and colour) with biological performance assessed via total coliform and E. coli enumeration post treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between the continuous flow and intermittent flow models for physical–chemical and total coliform reduction parameters. However, when evaluating E. coli, C-HSSF performed better (p = 0.02). The non-woven blanket was subjected to weekly analysis using a Clark-type amperometric microsensor (diameter < 20 µm), which measured dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration in the adherent biofilm. DO microprofiles illustrated a variation in biofilm growth, which were associated with a progressive increase in the HSSF efficiency. The maximum DO depletion value measured during several months of operation showed no significant difference between I-HSSF and C-HSSF (p = 0.98). The microsensor measurements provided unprecedented results in real time. These results can help to understand the efficiency of the filter in relation to the biofilm growth, the dissolved oxygen depletion and turbidity removal.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. The raw data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Additional information

Funding

This research was financially supported by Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) and UK Research and Innovation (SAFEWATER; EPSRC Grant Reference EP/P032427/1).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.