Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 24, 2008 - Issue 5
561
Views
57
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Test-retest reliability of cervicocephalic relocation test to neutral head position

, MSc, PT, , MSc, Eng, , PhD, , , PhD, PT & , PhD
Pages 380-391 | Published online: 10 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Considering the important role of the cervical joint position sense on control of human posture and locomotion, accurate and reliable evaluation of neck proprioceptive abilities appears of great importance. Although the cervicocephalic relocation test (CRT) to the neutral head position (NHP) usually is used for both research and clinical purposes, its test-retest reliability has not been clearly established yet. The purpose of the present experiment was to 1) evaluate the test-retest reliability of the CRT to NHP and 2) to determine the number of trial recordings required to ensure reliable measurements. To this aim, 40 young healthy adults performed the CRT to NHP on two separate occasions. Ten trials were performed for each rotation side. Absolute and variable errors, processed along their horizontal, vertical, and global components, were used to assess the cervical joint repositioning accuracy and consistency, respectively. Mean difference between test and retest with 95% confidence interval, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland and Altman graphs with limits of agreement were used as statistical methods for assessing test-retest reliability. Results show that the CRT to NHP when executed in its original form (i.e., 10 trials) has a fair to excellent reliability (ICC ranged from 0.52 to 0.81 and from 0.49 to 0.77, for absolute and variable errors, respectively); the test-retest reliability of this test increases as the number of trials used to establish subject's repositioning errors increases; and using the mean of eight trials is sufficient to ensure fair to excellent reliability of the measurements (ICC ranged from 0.39 to 0.78 and from 0.44 to 0.78, for absolute and variable errors, respectively).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.