Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 35, 2019 - Issue 7
340
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Report

Kinesiologic tape for labor pain control: Randomized controlled trial

, PT, PhD, , RN, PhD & , MD, PhD
Pages 614-621 | Received 19 Apr 2017, Accepted 28 Oct 2017, Published online: 02 Apr 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Kinesiologic taping has been studied for managing diverse types of dysfunctions and pain, but not for managing pain during labor. Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of using kinesiologic tape (KT) during labor relative to pain, maternal satisfaction, and obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Method: The study was a single-blind randomized controlled trial composed of 60 pregnant women divided into two groups. In the kinesiologic tape group (KTG), the tape was applied to the region of spinal nerves T10–L1 and S2–S4; in the control group (CG), the tape was applied to the region of spinal nerves T1–T4. Study participants were low-risk pregnant women with spontaneous onset of labor and no previous Cesarean section. Outcomes evaluated were pain, duration of labor, type of delivery, uterotonic and anesthetic requirement, neonatal vitality, and satisfaction with delivery and tape use. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed, and risk ratios with a 95% CI were estimated. Results: After the first hour of tape use, a significant increase in pain was observed in the CG (p = 0.002). However, there were no differences between groups relative to the remaining outcomes assessed. In the KTG, 59% of participants reported satisfaction with tape use, whereas in the CG, 44% reported satisfaction with tape use. Conclusion: Despite its safety, the KT technique did not prove to effectively control labor pain.

Acknowledgments

Maria Amelia Miquelutti received a personal scholarship from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes, Brazil) for implementing the present study.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

Maria Amelia Miquelutti received a personal scholarship from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes, Brazil) for implementing the present study.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.