Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 37, 2021 - Issue 6
570
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Descriptive Report

Reliability and validity of the timed 360° turn test in people with multiple sclerosis

, PT, MScORCID Icon, , PT, PhDORCID Icon, , PT, PhDORCID Icon, , PT, MScORCID Icon, , MDORCID Icon & , MDORCID Icon
Pages 736-747 | Received 23 Nov 2018, Accepted 06 Jun 2019, Published online: 18 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate (1) the intrarater, interrater, and test–retest reliability of the timed 360° turn test in people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS); (2) the minimum detectable change in the timed 360° turn test times; (3) the concurrent and discriminant validity of the timed 360° turn test times; and (4) the cut-off times that best discriminate people with MS from healthy people and fallers from non-fallers with MS.

Method: Sixty-one people with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS, 0–6.5) and 34 healthy people were recruited in this cross-sectional study. The timed 360° turn test was administered along with the Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, Four Square Step Test, and EDSS by two independent raters.

Results: The timed 360° turn test showed good intrarater, interrater, and test–retest reliability. Minimal detectable changes were 1.49 s and 1.53 s for the dominant and non-dominant sides, respectively. The timed 360° turn test was strongly correlated with other outcome measures. Significant differences in 360° turn times were found between people with MS and healthy people and between fallers and non-fallers with MS (p < .001 and p < .001, respectively). The cut-off times of 2.65 s on the dominant side and 2.42 s on the non-dominant best discriminated people with MS from healthy people, while 3.65 s on the dominant side and 3.75 s on the non-dominant best discriminated fallers from non-fallers with MS.

Conclusions: The timed 360° turn test is a simple and reliable tool for assessing turning ability in MS.

Acknowledgments

We thank the individuals who participated in this study.

Declaration of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.