Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 38, 2022 - Issue 2
219
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Descriptive Report

The MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care: A validation of the Persian-language version

, PT, PhD, , PT, PhD, , PT, MSc, , PT, MSc, , MD, , MD, , MD & , PhD.,PT, OCS, FAPTA show all
Pages 355-364 | Received 23 Aug 2019, Accepted 03 Mar 2020, Published online: 05 May 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Valid and reliable tools are required to measure patient satisfaction with physical therapy care. The aim of this study was to translate the MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care (MRPS) into Persian language and to evaluate its measurement properties.

Methods: A cross-sectional and prospective validation study design was adopted. The development of the Persian MRPS (MRPSp) followed the standard guidelines with “forward”–“backward” translation, consensus agreement of expert panel, and pilot testing. The final MRPSp was evaluated for reliability and validity.

Results: A total of 114 patients (mean age 52.14 years, 72 females) participated in this study. The patients’ satisfaction was high as reflected in the ceiling effect (25.4%). The overall Cronbach’s α was 0.91. Corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.22 to 0.88. Principal component analysis suggested a 7-item “internal” factor (alpha = 0.95) and a 3-item “external” factor (alpha = 0.74). The correlations of factors with two global measures of satisfaction were significant ranging from 0.247 to 0.789. Individual items of MRPSp had significant positive correlations with two global measures (r = 0.233–0.736). The standard error of measurement was between 0.97 and 2.14. The smallest detectable change was between 2.7 and 5.93.

Conclusion: The Persian version of the MRPS is a two-factor reliable and valid instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care.

Declaration of Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.