Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 38, 2022 - Issue 13
280
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Descriptive Report

Reliability of a recumbent stepper submaximal exercise test after traumatic brain injury

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 2896-2904 | Received 06 May 2020, Accepted 17 Apr 2021, Published online: 10 Jun 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To determine the test–retest reliability of a total body recumbent stepper (TBRS) submaximal exercise test and to examine its relationship with other measures throughout the International Classification of Functioning that are indicative of overall health in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods

Twenty-three ambulatory individuals with severe, chronic (>6 mos) TBI completed a TBRS submaximal exercise test, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) at initial testing. A repeat TBRS submaximal exercise test was conducted 4–7 days later. Estimated peak oxygen consumption (VO2) was calculated from the TBRS submaximal exercise test using the VO2 prediction equation. Average daily step count was collected by an activity monitor for the 4–7-day period between tests.

Results

Test-retest reliability was good (ICC3,1 = 0.79, p < .001). The difference between the tests was 0.46 ml・kg−1・min−1 which was not statistically different. Neither the 6MWT distance nor gait speed are related to the TBRS-estimated peak VO2. The MPAI-4 total score and adjustment subscale each had a fair relationship with the TBRS-estimated peak VO2 (r = −0.41, p = .05; rs = −0.41, p = .05, respectively).

Conclusion

These data suggest that the TBRS submaximal exercise test may be a reliable measure to estimate peak VO2 in ambulatory adults with chronic severe TBI.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the TBI survivors who participated in this study and their families.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Indianapolis In Query Grant [Index # 525017].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.