Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 38, 2022 - Issue 13
178
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Descriptive Report

Test–retest reliability and measurement error of the modified gait efficacy scale in individuals with stroke

, PT, Ph.D, , PT, PhD, , PT, PhD, , PT, M.Sc., , OT, PhD & , PT, PhD
Pages 2956-2961 | Received 17 Jun 2020, Accepted 05 Jun 2021, Published online: 23 Jul 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To investigate the test–retest reliability and measurement error of the Brazilian version of the modified Gait Efficacy scale (mGES-Brazil) in individuals who have had stroke.

Methods

The mGES-Brazil was applied on two occasions, five to seven days apart, in a research laboratory setting. Test–retest reliability and measurement error, which included the standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC), and analysis of the limits of agreement by the Bland–Altman plots, were examined.

Results

Fifty individuals who have had stroke (18 men), with a mean age of 64 ± 11 years, were evaluated. All individual items showed good reliability (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient – ICC2,1 > 0.90). The ICC was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) and the Bland and Altman plots revealed no systematic changes in the mean test–retest scores. The SEM (SEM%) was 3 (5%), within the recommended values, while the SDC was 8 points.

Conclusion

The mGES-Brazil demonstrated to be reliable to be applied within clinical and research contexts for the assessment of changes in walking confidence of individuals who have had stroke. Changes in mGES scores ≥8 points reflect real changes.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq – grant number 304434/2014-0); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG – PPM 00082-16); and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – (CAPES – code 001).

Disclosure statement

Nothing to declare.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the CAPES [Code 001]; CNPq [304434/2014-0]; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais [PPM 00082-16].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.