18
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Therapy preference and treatment outcome in clients with mild to moderate alcohol dependence

, &
Pages 209-216 | Received 02 Dec 2003, Accepted 03 Dec 2004, Published online: 12 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

The Brief Treatment Programme for Alcohol Dependence allocated 122 clients randomly to three different forms of brief therapy. Prior to allocation clients were asked what their preference would have been had allocation not been random. This study posed the question: did clients receiving their preferred treatment have a better outcome than those who did not? Also examined were differences in the treatment process variables of perceived effectiveness, satisfaction, rapport, engagement and number of sessions attended. The results were that there was no difference in either outcome or treatment process according to whether or not clients were allocated to their treatment of preference. It is concluded that these findings reinforce both the ethicality of the randomized controlled trial as a methodology for examining differential treatment outcomes in individual brief treatment of between one and five sessions for alcohol dependence and the validity of these findings as they might relate to real clinical settings. Finally, it is suggested that other researchers consider the inclusion of questions related to client preference. [Adamson SJ, Sellman JD, Dore GM. Therapy preference and treatment outcome in clients with mild to moderate alcohol dependence. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005;24:209 – 216]

Simon J. Adamson PhD, DipClinPsych, National Addiction Centre, Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Science, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand, J. Douglas Sellman MBChB, PhD, FRANZCP, FAChAM, National Addiction Centre, Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Science, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand, Glenys M. Dore MBChB, FRANZCP, Figtree Unit, Macquarie Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Correspondence to Dr Simon Adamson, National Addiction Centre, Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Science, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand. Tel: 64 3 364 0480; Fax: 64 3 364 1225; E-mail: [email protected]

Simon J. Adamson PhD, DipClinPsych, National Addiction Centre, Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Science, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand, J. Douglas Sellman MBChB, PhD, FRANZCP, FAChAM, National Addiction Centre, Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Science, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand, Glenys M. Dore MBChB, FRANZCP, Figtree Unit, Macquarie Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Correspondence to Dr Simon Adamson, National Addiction Centre, Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Science, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand. Tel: 64 3 364 0480; Fax: 64 3 364 1225; E-mail: [email protected]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.