34,368
Views
144
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Ethnography/Narrative

Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management

, &
Pages 238-259 | Received 05 Oct 2018, Accepted 02 Jan 2020, Published online: 01 Mar 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Business process management (BPM) research emphasises three important logics – modelling (process), infrastructural alignment (infrastructure) and procedural actor (agency) logics. These logics capture the dominant ways of thinking in BPM, reflected in its assumptions, practices and values. While the three logics have proven useful in prior contexts, we argue that the applicability of these underlying assumptions in theorising BPM needs to be re-examined in the context of digital transformation. Based on an ethnographic study of BPM in a company undergoing digital transformation, we uncover tensions related to applying these prior logics that point to the need to update the underlying assumptions. Consequently, we propose new logics that we conceptualise as light touch processes (process), infrastructural flexibility (infrastructure) and mindful actors (agency). Our observations contribute to a rethinking of the dominant BPM logics by unpacking their dynamics in the context of digital transformation. Our study further highlight salient differences between digital transformation and IT-enabled organisational transformation contexts. We conclude by proposing new managerial approaches for BPM in digital transformation contexts.

Acknowledgements

Our appreciation goes to the review team for their impeccable consistency and developmental feedback that significantly improved this paper. We particularly appreciate the senior editor(s) for believing in the paper throughout. Our gratitude also goes to Heli B., Eric Kipongi, Rob Gleasure and Michel Avital for their invaluable support and feedback in the development of this paper. We thank the participants of the Mediterranean Conference of Information Systems - MCIS 2018, where an early version of the paper received a best paper award.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.