1,088
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

A scoping review of the utility of self-report and informant-report prospective memory measures

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1230-1260 | Received 19 Dec 2019, Accepted 05 Jan 2021, Published online: 21 Jan 2021
 

ABSTRACT

There has been increased use of self-report prospective memory (PM) scales in recent years, despite uncertainty about their validity. This study reviewed how self-and informant-report PM questionnaires have been used in the assessment of PM. We evaluated relationships between self-report, informant-report, and performance-based PM measures, and the validity of using self-report measures in detecting PM impairments and monitoring intervention outcomes. The scoping review methodology of Arksey and O'Malley (Citation2005. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32) was used. Database searches yielded 488 published studies that used the Prospective Memory Questionnaire (PMQ), Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ), Comprehensive Assessment of PM (CAPM), and Brief Assessment of PM (BAPM). The self-report and informant-report measures of PM had weak- to moderate-strength relationships with performance-based PM measures. Some self-report PM scales could detect PM impairments and monitor intervention outcomes, however few studies had investigated this. The findings indicated that self- and informant-report scales measure different constructs to performance-based measures of PM. It is recommended that these scales be used alongside performance-based measures to provide complementary and comprehensive assessments of PM. Further research into assessment of PM using self-report measures will aid assessment and treatment choices.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Ethical standards

This review focussed on information contained within published research and did not involve human experimentation.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship (N.S.) and Charles Sturt University Faculty of Business, Justice, and Behavioural Studies Early Career Researcher Compact Grant (N.S., 136).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.