604
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A systematic review of self-concept change in multiple sclerosis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1774-1813 | Received 27 Jun 2021, Accepted 11 Jan 2022, Published online: 16 Feb 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Self-concept or sense of self is often altered in the context of neurological illness. Yet, these core aspects of subjective experience are poorly understood for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). This systematic review aimed to synthesize the findings of quantitative and qualitative studies investigating self-concept in MS. PsycINFO, MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were last systematically searched in May 2021, with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualiatative Research used to appraise the quality of the eligible articles. Articles were included if they measured or explored self-concept in MS populations, were published in English and peer-reviewed. A total of 30 studies (11 quantitative, 19 qualitative) were identified. Quantitative studies were synthesized using a narrative approach, with results suggesting that MS is associated with some degree of self-concept change. Qualitative studies were synthesized using thematic synthesis, with results illustrating a complex process of self-concept change that is catalyzed by MS-related events and characterized by varying degrees of resistance to, or acknowledgement of, such changes. Future prospective longitudinal studies are needed to characterize the nature of self-concept change in MS using validated tools that measure relevant aspects of self-concept for the MS population.

Data availability statement

Information that contributed to this manuscript, including template data collection forms, data extracted from included studies, analytic codes, etc., are available from the first author by request.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Miss Emery is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship awarded by the College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.