ABSTRACT
In new democracies, horizontal accountability tends to be more fragile than vertical since authoritarian institutional legacies are more difficult to transform than organising free and fair elections. These barriers to full democratisation are stronger at subnational levels, where local old authoritarian elites are better able to hold institutional power and block transformations. This viewpoint presents data from Brazil, one of the strongest democracies of the Global South. After three decades of free elections, the design of oversight institutions of Brazilian subnational governments has hardly changed from dictatorial periods, leading to administrative practices and routines that undermine the transparency of monitoring and assessing public policy. Using institutional and behavioural measures of transparency, it shows that there are important bottlenecks to adequate accountability in Brazil.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes on contributors
Gustavo Andrey de Almeida Lopes Fernandes is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Public Management, Fundação Getúlio Vargas – EAESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Antonio Carvalho Teixeira is an Associate Professor and Researcher in the Department of Public Management, Fundação Getúlio Vargas – EAESP.
Ivan Filipe de Almeida Lopes Fernandes is a Professor in the Program of Public Policy, Engineering Modeling and Applied Social Sciences Center, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo Andre, Brazil.
Fabiano Angélico PhD candidate in the Department of Public Management, Fundação Getúlio Vargas – EAESP.