235
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
TOPICAL ISSUES AND COMMENT

Summary trial – too summary?

Peter Hungerford-Welch argues that speed must not be achieved at the expense of the right of the accused to a fair trial

Pages 10-11 | Published online: 10 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

On 21 July 2006, the government published Delivering Simple Speedy, Summary Justice (Department for Constitutional Affairs, Citation2006a), which set out plans to improve the speed and effectiveness of the Magistrates’ court system. Lord Falconer, then Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs and Lord Chancellor, wrote in the foreword that the government's vision was to deliver a criminal justice system that deals with cases ‘fairly but as quickly as possible’. This article suggests that, whilst efficiency is in everyone's interests, according undue priority to haste may have an adverse effect on the fairness of the trial process.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Peter Hungerford-Welch

Peter Hungerford-Welch is Assistant Dean (Professional Programmes) at The City Law School, City University, London.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.