https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2439-2830
![Sample our Behavioral Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110801/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Behavioral-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
Background
Digital technologies enable the dissemination of multimedia resources to support adults with serious mental illness in their self-management and personal recovery. However, delivery needs to accommodate engagement and accessibility challenges.
Aims
We examined how a digital resource, designed for mental health workers and consumers to use together in session, would be used in routine practice.
Methods
Thirty consumers and their workers participated. The web-based resource, Self-Management And Recovery Technology (SMART), was available to use within and between sessions, for a 6-month period. Workers initiated in-session use where relevant. Feasibility was explored via uptake and usage data; and acceptability and impact via questionnaires. A pre-post design assessed recovery outcomes for consumers and relationship outcomes for consumers and workers.
Results
In participating mental health practitioner-consumer dyads, consumers gave strong acceptability ratings, and reported improved working relationships. However, the resource was typically used in one-third or fewer appointments, with consumers expressing a desire for greater in-session use. Improvements in self-rated personal recovery were not observed, possibly contributed to by low usage.
Conclusions
In-session use was found helpful by consumers but may be constrained by other demands in mental health care delivery: collaborative use may require dedicated staff time or more formal implementation.
Acknowledgements
The SMART research program was supported by a Mental Illness Research Fund Grant (MIRF33), from the Victorian State Government Department of Health and Human Services, Australia. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of partner services, peer video contributors, software developers, videographer, consumer and practitioner reference groups, and research team members Sue Farnan, Rosalie Frankish, Rebecca Gomo, Katrina Lindblom, Tara Smark, Vanessa von Berg and Friedericke Wahl.
Ethics statement
This research was conducted with the review and approval of Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee (502-14) and Swinburne University Ethics Committee (2015/011).
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 In Australia, the word “consumer” refers to people with lived experience of mental health issues and services