Abstract
Purpose: Timing deficits can have a negative impact on the lives of survivors post-chronic stroke. Studies evaluating ways to improve timing post stroke are scarce. The goal of the study was to evaluate the impact of a single session of haptic guidance (HG) and error amplification (EA) robotic training interventions on the improvement of post-stroke timing accuracy.
Materials and methods: Thirty-four survivors post-chronic stroke were randomly assigned to HG or EA. Participants played a computerized pinball-like game with their affected hand positioned in a robot that either helped them perform better (HG) or worse (EA) during the task. A baseline and retention phase preceded and followed HG and EA, respectively, in order to assess their efficiency at improving absolute timing errors. The impact of the side of the stroke lesion on the participants’ performance during the timing task was also explored for each training group.
Results: An improvement in timing performance was only noted following HG (8.9 ± 4.9 ms versus 7.8 ± 5.3 ms, p = 0.032). Moreover, for the EA group only, participants with a left-sided stroke lesion showed a worsening in performance as compared to those with a right-sided stroke lesion (p = 0.001).
Conclusion: Helping survivors post-chronic stroke perform a timing-based task is beneficial to learning. Future studies should explore longer and more frequent HG training sessions in order to further promote post stroke motor recovery.
Timing is crucial for the accomplishment of daily tasks.
The number of studies dedicated to improving timing is scarce in the literature, even though timing deficits are common post stroke.
This innovative study evaluated the impact of a single session of haptic guidance-HG and error amplification-EA robotic training interventions on improvements in timing accuracy among survivors post chronic stroke.
HG robotic training improves timing accuracy more than EA among survivors post chronic stroke.
Implications for Rehabilitation
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mathieu Hamel and Antoine Guillerand for their technical support, as well as the clinicians from the day hospital at the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l’Estrie-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (Youville Pavilion). The study took place at the Laboratoire d’innovations technologiques at the Research Center on Aging in Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Disclosure statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding information
Funding was provided by Prof. Marie-Hélène Milot’s funds from the Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé [FMSS] (Université de Sherbrooke). Amy Bouchard received a scholarship from the FMSS and a scholarship from the Research Center on Aging.